top of page

THE PROPER ETYMOLOGY OF OUR TRADITION
 

Etymology and Concepts of Druwayu:

 

Druwayu is a modern polytheistic and philosophic religion and tradition. It should not, however, be associated as or with anything often defined under the umbrellas of paganism or heathenry. While it draws from ancient sources of information it does not claim to be a continuation or reconstruction of such things. We are to avoid Passively Imposed Stupidity. PIS for short.

 

Its History and Etymology:

Druwayu was so named in January 2014 but has existed and developed over time for decades based on the work and research of its founder Raymond S. G. Foster, who is recognized as the First True Warlock. He also established the order called the Drusidu intended to be the custodianship of Druwayu and to serve as the council and administration of elders wherein the male clergy are called Warlocks and the female clergy are called Witches. Three important words have to be understood here in some of this composition from the start which will then proceed to the factors of the meaning of these titles for the clergy as a whole.

  1. Drú is the Gaulish spelling of the word Trú where we get the modern for True in English. It has the sense of strong, dedicated, and enduring and figuratively for Fact, Real and Consistent.

  2. Wáyú comes from the same linguistic roots that becomes Ways. It has the sense of direction, course, and path and figuratively for customs, traditions, culture and Religion.

  3. Sídú/Síðú simply means Seats. It was absorbed into later Latin as Sedes retaining the same meaning and applied as the same as Greek kathedra and thronos which evolved into Cathedral and Chair as well as Throne by way of Latin. 

This third word has often been claimed to mean 'Customs' in and of itself but this is actually false. Ut is from this commonly false definition Druwayu was originally called Sidutru in 2009 where the intention of the meaning was "Customs of Truth" which demonstrates the core intention of this religious formation initially where impersonal truth would be the primary guiding force and principle directive of this identity.

 

However, it was actually by accident that the real meaning of Sidu (singular alternative of Siðr) was discovered in November of 2012 to actually be akin to Latin spelling from the 700s CE introduced through Norman French to become rendered in Latin as Sedes meaning Seat/Chair/Throne and that the use of Sidu as meaning Custom(s) was inaccurate.

 

When having come across and then researching further into the source of the Catholic "Holy See," iy was simply known as the Vatican, a later rendition of the word from Latin Vatis, later to be called Vates which is Etruscan in origin, not so called Celtic. Its a combination formed from merging vatis used to mean both prophet and poet with canna meaning a reed wand.

 

The so called Cathedra/Thronos Petra as in the "Throne of St. Peter" didn't exist until the 9th century CE. The concept of this as the Holy Sedes has its origins in actuality with King Liutprand of the Lombards (and also related to such as the Frank from which the name France is derived) in 728 CE and some rewriting of Monks to align such things with Rome (this includes invented of myths of native beliefs actually based on Roman and specifically Etruscan mythology).

 

This was also the beginning of Godan being absorbed and later reduced to the spelling of God as a means of synchronizing native beliefs with Estruscan, Roman Latin and Greek Aos Si, Deus and Theo and reworking many such things and imposing such as the claimed "original" beliefs of native people but under a Roman construct and then reworked further to justify the imposition of Catholicism and redefining native words to mean things they never did and then among other things imposing laws through rulers to ban use of original native tongues. This is all known historical fact.

 

In turn Rulers merging such things willingly (and a hefty amount of funding to secure their native ruling) also brought with and adapted many features of the aldwayu (old ways) of native cultures with the niuwayu (new ways) of the Roman Catholic religion. Because natives did not have a concept of religion as came from this Roman and more modern loose definitions again by associations rather than meaning, wayu or ways came to be applied in a figurative sense which occurred with many such things.   

It was then that the name was Changed to Druwayu. 

 

We didn't completely abandon this knowledge either. We simply reversed and adjuster the compound words as Drusidu to mean True Seats as a proper name for the council to carry the sense of Dedicated Chairs. This became for Druwayu similar to such as the Althingi of Iceland and what the Greeks called the Sanhedrin, and thereby our own Druish supreme council and tribunal of the Druans and as the custodianship of Druwayu.

As such more direct and cultural rather than the garbage of European mysticism and occultism based on factual historical research and not all the mass amounts of imposed fiction and blind stupidity being perpetuated in these times inspired the formation and clarification of such matters so many only repeat out of habit and others refuse to acknowledge their assumptions or beliefs are wrong because its what their "relatives" of some equally ignorant famous whoever they get all fanatical in their devotion to spouts off pretending to know more than they actually do. 

In any case its this and many more reasons why the name of the Religion is Druwayu and only Druwayu meaning True Ways which one can also out of humor and Sarcasm say it also means the "True Religion" though the sense is in proper context a dedicated path, Druan a term for one who adopts ad becomes an adherent of Druwayu, Drusidu used as the name for the council of elders because its context is in this case "True Seats" in the sense of dedicated chairs, and Warlocks and Witches used as the titles for the male and female elders of the Drusidu.

However, before it was called because of the misinformation Sidutru and being corrected as Druwayu, I as the founder, along with original members who were born in Salem, Keizer, Albany and Silverton Oregon was jokingly called 3 Covens because it "sounded like a European" name for a town. This was also the name of the original Website first on Angelfire, which we later deleted and moved to another web host till they started cutting the number of pages and options. Eventually that one was closed as well by us.

 

We tried to share the information on various social communities that claimed to be "open to knowledge" but it became clear as the moderators of such chose to go against there own standards and claims and intentionally distorted and confused the information to the point it became a huge incoherent mess. They could have simply deleted it but they were being assholes and this was found to be the normal tendency of them all, so by 2009 we stopped trying for a while. In 2011 we started with Sidutru and then in 2014 stabilize as Druwayu.

 

By 2019, unfortunately, 26 of the original members out of 28 including myself had passed away. Some from old age, some from various medical issues, and some from bad choices. 4 died in a car accident. This left just myself and one other. That person couldn't motivate themselves to be part of this but stuck around till 2018 mostly staying in touch online and then one day stopped communicating online, or by phone.     


So on February 8th, 2019 I created Northwest Warlocks and Witches with the intention to provide a solid community of sharing information and clarifying the sources of etymology as more of an education sight, which also allowed other members to post various related themes and folk concepts but also with a strict expectation not to allow extremist nonsense pushing the same old horseshit of before on that site.

 

Its grown slowly over the years and has been maintained as a respectful but small community which is just fine. The original logo was based in the logo created for the Drusidu using the Pitchfork associated with the Warlock and three Brooms for Three Witches of old Folklore. After a more recent medical scare I decided I wouldn't let the history of all this and the many efforts made go into oblivion. So I created a sister page more or less to Northwest Warlocks and Witches and changed its logo to its own specific design distinct from the one used for the Drusidu. The Examples are below:

It is now that I have created the First Church of Druwayu as the culmination of these efforts an to expand the options and opportunities of others who would like to help and participate in the restorations and redistribution of the tradition and culture it represents, having also taken the time to establish the basic teachings, the creed, the terms, the concepts, and the specific symbols.

 

Now that al that has been clarified, it is time to move on to other important etymology such as that of Warlock ad Witch. The most common misnomer one will find, is the statement that "A warlock is a male practitioner of witchcraft and counterpart to a witch, a female practitioner of witchcraft." The fact that makes it a misnomer is twofold.

 

In actuality the texts from which both titles originate in for certainty are about 60 years apart in approximate age where Warlock is the elder of the two. Second, the word craft was applied to anything associated as a job, trade, skill and so forth so properly speaking which was once actually known from more than a few sources that Warlockcraft and Witchcraft are equal terms but only in the sense as being the same basic associations.

 

So properly speaking as has been the case for well over a millennium the counterpart to a Warlock is a Witch and other than that the only word applicable is "craft" equally applied to both. Otherwise Warlockery and Witchery sufficed. The presentation of Warlocks and Witches as somehow being "fundamentally opposed" is also as such extremist feminist nonsense that more or less used Warlock as a stand in term for men in general and Witch for women in general. This more or less plays off the crap of "men bad/women good" as "warlock bad/witch good" garbage.


Another nonsense spin that has been imposed mostly from the same sources continuously associate both in one way or another with homosexuality and Devil Worship. Nothing can be further from the truth and does actually occur mostly in the later 1960s onward. The Devil worship bit tended to be in the middle Medieval period when previously it was more accurately stated they represented a type of native clergy of elders of the rather vaguely and often intentionally distorted source material of a polytheistic people. 

​In any case, both Warlock for men and Witch for women as titles of those considered to be in communication with such as spirits of the land, sea and sky and gifts of so called second sight, and so forth has been used as such in numerous written works of folklore, poetry and literature for over a thousand years. Equals in duty and only opposites in their gender distinctions such could be seen as helpful, harmful or ambivalent like anything or anyone else. Above all else they are and were just people with a specific cultural and social role. 

 

The fact is that both titles come from what is known as Old Saxon and Anglo Saxon which goes back to sources from the 800s ad were mostly being employed as 'conversion texts" which also means Warlocks and Witches represented such elders of specifically Old Saxon and Anglo Saxon cultural identity those one cannot ignore another key factor that Anglo and Saxon are both derived from Latin words as well.

 

"Sax" is a Latin root meaning "stone" that was also spelled seax and Angle as in Anglo and Angles and what would come to be called English means Corner. The so called "ancestor" or deity of the Saxons was claimed to be Saxnota. It literally means Stone Note. Perhaps this was Old Roman style sarcasm of word games in reference to so called rune stones. That being clarified the following factual etymology that has been intentionally and repeatedly ignored despite more than a few proofs to support such facts is presented in the following with actual sources cited and the context they were being used in and why.

Etymology of Warlock:

 

The most commonly accepted etymology derives warlock from the Old English wǣrloga, with the first known source is the Heliand and does not mean "breaker of oaths" or "deceiver".

The form wærloga|wǣrloga]] is a short form of the previous plural wârlogan pronounced wær-loh-an. Wâr is akin to vir (man). Log, also as lag (lah) is the source of the word law as in byrlog (town law and later as bi-law). It is entirely a masculine word. The singular was wârlog. Warlog was translated as Warloh, it became Warloch through later German and related roots giving its Present form. The meaning is men of laws or simply lawmen, a term applied in the sense of a magistrate (one who administers the laws).

The source of the plural word wârlogan is the Heliand. Heliand is a combination of Old Saxon Heli which can mean both heal and holy as the base meaning is to make whole, though it is often glossed with the word Savior (One who saves/salvages). The specific phrase cited often from this text is:

Te hui gi warlogan quat hie, undot min so fruocno, Ne scal iu that te frumu werthan,Than welliu ik iu te waron quat hie.

 

To who you lawmen quote he, and me so wise, no shall you that I to from worths, then well you I you to warn quote he.

Its a very thick and archaic form of linguistics difficult for most to understand today with clarity. However the following also breaks each word down to its parts:

  • Te - “To/the”

  • hui - “who/how”

  • gi - “you” (plural only)

  • warlogan - “lawmen” (plural only)

  • quat - “quote/said”

  • hie - “he”

  • undot - “and”

  • min - “my/me”

  • so - “so”

  • fruocno - “fruitful” or “wise”

  • Ne - “No/Not”

  • scal - “shall”

  • iu - “you” (singular/plural)

  • that - “that”

  • te - “to/the”

  • frumu - “begins/beginning”

  • werthan - “worthy”

  • Than - “Then”

  • welliu - “well/will you”

  • ik - “I”

  • iu - “you” (singular/plural)

  • te - “to/the”

  • waron - “warn”

  • quat - “what/quote/said”

  • hie - “he”

To give a more intelligible modern without betraying the original text it transliterates as:

"How can you lawmen quote him and my wisdom? You shall not let this begin worthy, so then I will warn you, quote he."

Some sources will claim its related to the word for outlaw. Útlog is outlaw. Óth breker means oath breaker. So that alone disproves the false meaning. Regardless if it is as it was, later spelled warloga or warloge or any of the other variations, it doesn't change the gender of the word at all.

 

Variations of spelling include:

Warlowe, warlou, werlou, werlawe, warlouʒ, warloghe, warlau, warlawe, warlagh(e), werlau(ghe) warlach, warlag, warloc, warlok, warlage, warthel-, werlok, wirlok, warlaʒes, worlais, warlais, and werlahen.

Related Terms of Activity:

Warlockery, Warlockcraft/Warloghecræft, Warlocked

It must be understood what the Heliand is. It is a poem as more of a Catholic Christian Allegory written in Old Saxon style. It is all related to how the Pharisees who are called "lawmen or men of the law" quote their Torah (the book of laws and traditions in Judaism)and try to use it to catch Jesus in a theological and philosophical trap. The same are later called breakers of the covenant and traitors and sons of the Devil which is how the word that came to be spelled as Warlock over the centuries was used as a gloss for Pharisees, Sadducees and the Scribes to name a few though the word means nothing of the like. Case in point.

The Scottish Origin claim never notes the actual source of that claim and often proceeds with such as:

The term came to apply (but does not mean) to "the devil" around 1000 AD. In early modern Scots, the word came to refer to the male equivalent of a "witch," which is often falsely claimed  because of later erroneous assumptions and illiteracy, that it can be applied to either male or female, but has historically been used predominantly for females from the very origins of the word.

 

The title didn't become associated in Scotland with male practitioners later. It started out that way. In fact all the actual literature that presents witches also includes warlocks making it clear they are on the 'same team' and were also later claimed to have special unnatural powers owing to the idea that they had made pacts with Auld Hornie (meaning Old Horny as a figurative term for the devil).

 

The claim Warlock (and frankly Witch also at that time) had betrayed the Christian faith and broke their baptismal vows or oaths goes back to the previous stated concept of Pharisees betraying "the Messiah/Christ" according to later Christian thought when such were translated as simply "men of the law" when Warlock was used as a gloss or replacement word as Witch has often been as well. Those who continue to try and impose false separations and distinctions do to often out of their own anti-male extremist feminist sexism and engage in intentional historic revisionism. 

The actual source is John Dryden, an English poet, literary critic, translator, and playwright from the 1600’s CE. Year of Quotation: Between 1672-1673 CE.

Warlock, in Scotland is applied to a man whom the vulgar suppose to be conversant with spirits, as a woman who carries on the same commerce is called a witch.

 

This has been documented in such as the April 15th, 1755 CE. Original Edition "A Dictionary of the English Language" Page 2243 where Warlock is spelled Warluck for reasons unknown. The same source is likewise cited in the First Edition “A dictionary of the Scottish Language” published on January 1, 1818.

Perhaps the reason it is never cited is because it counters the claims of the gender neutrality of Warlock and/or Witch when Witch as the female counterpart goes back to 893 in the Domboc. In addition it also often occurs that some will further try and distort the facts with statements such as:

"Although most victims of the witch trials in early modern Scotland were women, some men were executed as warlocks."

 

In reality, women were accused and sometimes executed as witches just as often as men were were accused and sometimes executed as warlocks. In his day, the Scottish mathematician John Napier (1550–1617) was often perceived as a warlock or magician because his interests in divination and the occult, though his establishment position likely kept him from being prosecuted.

 

There is also of course the other assumed fallacy of the association of Warlock with Vardlokkur. This is bad etymology and a disregard for the source of the information with is the Saga of Erik the Red, who was active around 980s CE and is mentioned as a type of sung prayer to call upon and bind a protection upon those present.

Varð-lokkur is a combination of varð which is the same as ward with the base meaning of guard and protect and only used figuratively when applied to persons, places or things with lokkur being the source of the word locker, as in something that binds, holds or fasten things together, from the base form lok, also spelled loc, but can and has been used figuratively for a place of storage. It is seldom mentioned that Icelandic does not use the letter 'c' and in fact in native form is Íslenska. Failing to consider these facts the usual following content is often applied by erroneous assumptions and regurgitation of the same errors between sources simply copying the same mistakes without better research.

From this use, the word passed into Romantic literature and ultimately into 20th-century popular culture. A derivation from the Old Norse varð-lokkur, "caller of spirits", has also been suggested, The Oxford English Dictionary considers this implausible owing to the extreme rarity of the Norse word and because forms without hard -k. This further supports my previous examples and essentially proves my point that much of what is claimed is overgeneralized nonsense and most sources never correct or accept correction to old errors and fallacies as previously stated.

Etymology of Witch:

 

Witch, from the Old English wiʧe/wiʧa/, spelled as wicce/wicca (singular feminine), is a term rooted in European folklore and superstition for a practitioner of witchcraft, magic or sorcery. Traditionally associated with malevolent magic, with those accused of witchcraft being the target of witch-hunts, in the modern era the term has taken on different meanings. In literature, a 'witch' can now simply refer to an alluring women capable of 'bewitching' others. In neopagan religions such as Wicca the term has meanwhile been adopted as the female term for an adherent. Is this true? Well, a lot of it is again fiction and misrepresentation of the actual history and source of the word and modern intentional distortions.

The modern spelling witch with the medial 't' first appears in the 16th century. From the feminine plural Wiccan (weech-en, later reduced as wicca). Singular wicce/wicca is akin to Latin vica/vice that meant ‘speak,’ surviving in Old Slavic as veche and Old Russian "вече"(pl. веча, vecha) vecha with the same basic meaning of speak, talk, tell, and call. Evolving to Wecha in Danish and eventually Witch through German. It’s entirely a feminine word. The male counterpart for witch is in actuality warlock also being of Old Saxon Origin.

First Known Source:

 

The Dōmbōc. Pronounced Doom Book, It is Code of Alfred or Legal Code of Ælfred the Great, 893 CE. Language: Old Anglo Saxon.

 

Usage in the Domboc:

 

It was used figuratively for such terms and concepts as female oracles based on the core meaning and also expanded upon to include the concept and context of fortune tellers and female necromancers that "called" upon spirits of the dead as well as other entities. In this sense they served more counseling and consoling roles. Now consider that some "joke" referring to a woman as a "witch" spelled with a "b" when the target of the insult is being insulted for whatever reason. Well, there is a bit more too it than is actually realized.

 

If we note that the word for a female dog is bitch and look up the etymology it spelled as either bicce or bicca and it doesn't change the gender of the word at all. Some think this is a joke. It really isn't. Its proper etymology and linguistics regardless how others use it improperly. And on that note If you’re going to define everything by spewing rhetoric and opinions without facts or research, then I will address it and call you on it especially when its disproved. The agree to disagree bit in this case is not a solution. Its a coward's escape plan. 

So called Academia needs to get over itself:

So despite these facts, such things as "etymology online" and even the Oxford English Dictionary ignore these facts which are retained even in their own reference materials, however, many times they avoid citing who exactly they drew their information from to present their conclusions. So choosing to see what one want's instead of what is right in front of that one is not a new problem, but it is still shoddy scholarship and willful academic ignorance. However we do have earlier sources that lay things out based in the actual consistent history of such things seldom cited specifically and that is the so called Scottish Origin claim which is a half truth and whole fiction once you know the following source.

So I have indeed clarified the meaning and source of warlog and warlogan and the proper pronunciations. I have more than adequately demonstrated the context such was being used and applied the same clear and easy to deduce “wicca” and “wicce” are not actually two words but one word and that the plural was wiccan more commonly mispronounced “wick-an,” a plural form. When sources are wrong, they are wrong an they must get over themselves when its demonstrated to be wrong.

As to where one finds reference to Witches in plural form as Wiccan, it also occurs in the Dombok under this phrase that is often heavily mistranslated and elements of it are also likewise misrepresented. As such the original with its corrected translation in proper context of how Wicce/Wicca/Wech/Wecha is used for a female oracle and is as follows for sake of argument:

Ða fæmnan þe gewuniað onfon gealdorcræftigan & scinlæcan & wiccan, ne læt þu ða libban.

The women are accustomed to receiving golden-crafts & skin plays, & witches, no let you they live.

This shows a very different and proper context than what is often presented. In fact, what we have here seems to indicate that those who accept golden items as payments and engage in skin play which may be a reference to sex and seek council from Witches are the ones being condemned here rather than the Witches themselves as it is all indicative of prostitutes and prostitution. ​We used the same method of breaking down each word in the composition as:

  • Ða fæmnan: The women

  • þe: who

  • gewuniað: are accustomed to

  • onfon: receiving

  • gealdor: golden (from geald = gold, used figuratively for reward/payment)

  • cræftigan: crafts

  • &: and

  • scin: skin/shine

  • læcan: plays

  • &: and

  • wiccan: witches/oracles

  • ne: no

  • læt: let

  • þu: thou

  • ða: they

  • libban: live/living

Skin Play is particularly curious as it could be a slang term for sexual activity, refer to stripping, or dressing up in animal skins for ceremonial reasons. Its rather obscure as a term, though the tone of the sentence seems to lean more towards sexual activity than anything else. So a reasonable amount of uncertainty must be recognized in this particular application but not the proper translation of the word.  What can be rejected and what is demonstrable a false set of translations is such as the following:

  1. Gealdorcræftigan: false translation as: spell-crafters/magicians/incantations

  2. Scinlæcan: false translation as: phantom-players/female wizards/evil spirits

Simply put the actual and correct etymology does not support the claims and demonstrates many examples of those imposing things into such languages they chose to intentionally ignore in order to impose a completely different and false definition as occurred with Warlock, not unlike how some laughably enough tried to link Witch with the word wiggle.

The false translation is often presented as:

Women who are accustomed to receiving enchanters and sorceresses and witches, do not let them live!

Another example includes the homilies of the Old English grammarian Ælfric, dating to the late 10th century were we find this plural again which is more closely translated as:

Ne sceal se cristena befrinan tha fulan wiccan be his gesundfulnysse.

No shall the Christian befriend the fouled witches by his healthfullness.

​​

Usually this is translated as a closer to the proper form I provided as:

A Christian should not consult foul witches concerning his prosperity.

One can see how the tone is yet again changed which though similar to the proper, it lends to a misrepresentation that leads into other false narratives and further improper translations. The word wicca also appears in Halitgar's earlier Latin Penitential, but only once in the phrase swa wiccan tæcaþ ('as witches teach'), which seems to be an addition to Halitgar's original, added by an 11th-century Old English translator and demonstrates how intentional insertions to mislead later readers occurred and still occurs when others refuse to properly investigate and research these and other subjects.

In Old English glossaries the words wicce and wicca are used interchangebly but not as gender distinctions just as one finds the cord city also spelled cittie, sittee and so on. Either is used to gloss such Latin terms as augur, hariolus, conjector, and pythonyssa, all of which mean 'diviner, soothsayer, oracle, etc.' This reinforces the previous stated use of the titles as false catch terms for things that they did not mean and al based on definitions by associations rather than actual meanings.

Variations of spelling:

 

Veche, vicce, veech, vecha, viche, vetch, wech, wecha, wich, wicha, wicht, wichta, wicche-, wichua, wichche-, wichen, wichen(e), wuche-, wuches, whicche-, whicces-, wheche-, whuche, and whiche.

Related Terms of Activity:

Witchery, Witchcraft/Wiccecræft, Bewitched​

The origins of the word are specifically Old Saxon carried on into such as German as well as English wiccian, which has a cognate in Middle Low German wicken (attested from the 13th century, besides wichelen 'to bewitch').

 

The Common False Sources based in Speculation

Several much later sources proposed their own assumptions based on speculation and modern inventions toying with etymology and linguistics. Even their etymology claims simply do not stand up against the previous facts. Among these examples of false sources of information include but not limited to some famous names and many of which have been discredited repeatedly.

  1. The Brothers Grimm's Deutsches Wörterbuch connects the "Ingvaeonic word" *wikkōn with Gothic weihs 'sacred' (Proto-Indo European (PIE) *weik- 'to separate, to divide', probably via early Germanic practices of cleromancy such as those reported by Tacitus)

  2. R. Lühr connects wigol 'prophetic, mantic', wīglian 'to practice divination' (in reality its the source of wiggle) and suggests Proto-Germanic *wigōn, (c.f. Kluge's law) to *wikkōn.

  3. The basic form would then be the feminine, wicce < *wikkæ, < *wikkōn with palatalization due to the preceding i and the following *ee < *ōn in early Ingvaeonic. The palatal -cc- /t͡ʃ/ in wicca would then be analogous to the feminine as < *wikka.

This third example only proves my previous presented facts as to the proper etymology and demonstrates the fallacies of those who make such nonsensical claims that wicce is feminine, wicca is masculine and wiccan means the craft or religion as many still push despite it being a known fallacy. Just because, for example, if a homosexual man calls himself a queen, it does not change the fact it is still a completely feminine word and female title.

Another false claim is the Old English word for 'witch' was hægtes or hægtesse, when its more accurate to state that the word is actually from the form meaning hedge and hedges, which did became the modern English word "hag" and is linked to the word "hex." Only in this case do we see the gender neutral word being applied primarily as a feminine slur for an old woman.

 

In addition its actually from German and Saxon sources where English is a mixed language of several sources. In most other "Germanic languages," the word for 'witch' as well as warlock is substituted with Hexe (singular) and Hexen (plural) and Dutch heks and heksan where the more neutral sense is used but are not alternative or replacement words.

Its not related at all to Wick. Wick comes from Middle English weke, wicke (“wick”), from Old English wēoce (“wick”) with the basic sense of twist. This is the basis being the word 'wicked' which means twisted, often used figuratively for deformed or misshaped, as well as for bad, evil or false. Its not related to Latin vicus “village” as has often been claimed, nor any other terms for wise, watch, witness, weave, warp, weak, week and so on.  

Johannes Nider and other 15th century writers used the Latin term maleficus (masculine for mean malefic one as in harmful one) was used for heretics specifically, not Warlocks or Witches. Its because of modern sources after the 1800s inserting such associations in their later German and English forms that this nonsense was imposed and misdirects most into a false notion of what was actually occurring.

 

The whole purpose of such texts as the so called Malleus Maleficarum (1486) meaning literally mallet of the malefic ones as in ill doing or harmful ones was a heresy hunting manual targeting women considered easier to extract confessions from to expose their male kin and relatives as the members and leaders of different non-Catholic sects, among which were the Vaudois (Waldensians) originally known as the Poor of Lyon in the late twelfth century.

 

Their teachings (like others of the time) came into conflict with the Catholic Church and by 1215 and declared heretical, but because they were not willing to recognize the prerogatives of local bishops over the content of their preaching, nor to recognize standards about who was fit to preach and other common claims and practices considered "outside of the biblical" texts.

In 17th-century Russia, societal concern about the practice of "witches" related to whether their powers could cause harm. "Peasants" in Russian and Ukrainian societies often shunned presumed warlocks and witches, unless they felt they needed help against supernatural forces. Impotence, stomach pains, barrenness, hernias, abscesses, epileptic seizures, and convulsions were all attributed to evil influences as apposed to good ones. In Russia, three quarters of those accused of witchcraft or sorcery were men rather than women which was true elsewhere and contrary to modern feminist sexist nonsense.

​​The main takeaway: Witch as it is and has properly and historically been applied exclusively to women elders of these ancient concepts, with the male equivalent being Warlock, are in true neither good or bad words, and neither is insulting or pejorative regardless who pretend its the contrary due to indoctrination or simple ignorance. Those that continue to claim otherwise are engaging in the same nonsense they claim to "want stopped" and have temper tantrums over which is all the more nonsensical when they do not have a true cultural link to such things and are culturally divorced from the subject matter. In short, they know nothing and don't want to know and their willful idiocy only proves it.

AI did assist with proper translations: AI was also used to search out each specific word and word combination to increase the accuracy of the content which is why the words were also shown individually under the previous parts but it still needed a little help when breaking down the words and adding the literal meaning and the context of usage including figurative usage.

​Facts to Quote:

  1. A Warlock is a man, a Witch is a woman.

  2. It was a commonly held belief in Scotland but was not claimed to be from Scotland.

  3. Both are presented in a role of Exorcist and Necromancer as their profession.

  4. It's simply considered a trade using the word commerce as another word for craft, job or profession.

​​Common modern Lies:

Many get bent out of shape when its confronted yet the facts are superior to opinions and "feelings." Those that deny facts matter have already proven themselves to be unreliable and useless as sources of anything truly useful and informative. They are those who have dug in their heels with their anti-male nonsense which is the real reason for the resistance to facts and and have even expanded upon the original fiction to push the crap claim it means  ‘a witch who betrays their coven’.

 

There is, however, no historical evidence of this usage prior to the late 1950s. Its a modern invention and blatant lie, and a linguistic and etymological fallacy. From that lie stems the other claim of it meaning a traitor which when explored it al does not match up. Those that argue against the actual meaning of the original etymology also likewise invalidate their claims for reasons to reject the facts. They are playing into the same kind of nonsense where its claimed a Witch means and is an “ugly old quarrelsome or immoral woman.”

Important to know Facts:

I did not always use the word “warlock” to describe myself. The definitions for either Warlock or Witch has nothing to do with "personal feelings." I followed the actual evidence and did not stay stuck in some imposed culture bubble of costumed pretenders. In fact, I didn't really use any of these things and instead tended to use other terms such as minister and clergy because of my own ordination which goes way back to 1999 when I also received the honorary title of Doctor of Divinity rather quickly. I did all that for the minister side so I could legally officiate weddings for some friends. That was really my only or more or less primary intention.

 

  1. Being awarded the Doctor of Divinity bit was a bit of a challenge. Not in the sense of difficulty. It was literally a friend challenged me to get such recognition before he could. It took me only two weeks. Basically it came down to asking for the tests answering everything correctly which I did without effort, and then waited till I could pay for the paperwork credentials after it was made clear it passed. Many of my friends involved at the time just stated at my credentials I had hanging on my wall for the longest time after that.

  2. It actually came about later when a religious fanatic called me a Warlock. I laughed about it because I had learned the actual sources and etymology of such things previously. out of sarcasm I said "if it is as you say than I accept the title so given since its not a bad word and just happens not to be Hebrew, Greek or Latin (at least not in the content and context the guy was proclaiming).

  3. He accused me as worshiping the Devil to which I laughed and said I don't set my sights that low. That's what ended up setting a lot in motion from that point onward. It all started of course when I called him out on his hypocrisy and tried to save face from his public embarrassment which I only did in the first place because he was simply brow beating someone demanding they listen and was not letting them walk away, more or less imposing himself on them and I couldn't tolerate that.

  4. Suffice it to say this isn't Wic-ka. Its irrelevant if such who only are informed from all the garbage that spilled out of that dumpster fire claim warlock insult, meaning “oath-breaker” and especially the breaker of an oath one has made to their coven and witch is a gender neutral term. Never mind that this isn’t actually true remotely has already demonstrated.

  5. All such claims or connotations they make and impose themselves inventing false connotations just as those they claim to condemn for engaging in similar activities and demonstrating their own cowardice and overall hypocrisy of their own insecure in the knowledge that they are engaging in an etymological distortion. If you don't know what that is entirely look it. Most of them won't because they cannot handle an academic bruise to their fragile egos.

There major issue is they carry the stain that they cannot allow men to be men and women to be women and have to add all sorts of other complete bullshit to the mix demanding all others cater to their whims and their illusions and their mental illnesses. Well they can get over it and out their big person pants back on and walk out the way they came in. I will not submit, change or bow to their demands and belligerence, nor will I be bullied into redacting anything. That's not how truth works. 

Important to also consider:

Some do inherit certain "spiritual or so called psychic gifts," yet it is a fallacy to automatically apply that in a hereditary context for such titles. That's not how it actually worked. Yes, such things increased the probability within tribal cultures to learn to hone such abilities that made them more effective in such roles and more likely to gain such titles, yet such titles were by no means insured "just because." They certainly were not assumed frivolously. They held much deeper cultural significance than modern sources like to play games with.

 

  1. None of them were at all related to anything involving what came to be later occultism much less Satanism of any form. that was old smear campaigns.

  2. They were not as numerous as some like to pretend and more or less imposing their present nonsense onto past things they dont know as much about as they assume they do.

  3. Even fewer have any authentic lore that came down to them from family stories and tall tales and the whole Warlocks and Witches as apposing forces is also modern and predominately feminist invented garbage.

Factually, for too long we have sat back and allowed the Sacred Office of Warlocks as well as Witches to be misrepresented time and again. Warlocks (A Male Title of Honor and Duty) not only were once key figures in defending Witches (Our Female Kin Bound by the same Honor and Duties), they are part of the same culture, traditions, beliefs and practices who were Bound often under both secular and religious obligation as "Sacred Oaths of Office" literally sworn on oath rings as a common practice.

 

Their primary duties in kind included being those charged with the Advising and Keeping of Cultural Laws, Traditional Lore and Customs intact by which we Bound the People and Community at Large within a common identity and Society, be it Tribal, Clan, Village, Town, City or State. There are many references to these factors even though it becomes increasingly slanted over time to associations with the evil and diabolical. that is not to say there were no grotesque practices. No culture or society is free of such and to claim otherwise is also nonsense. Nor is it a justification to continue such things that frankly have no place in the present or future.

 

The Role of Warlocks and Witches were certainly more than simply "professionals" of any one specific craft as the later examples of such as John Dryden  and others presented which tended to also slant to the more or less exorcism and necromancy, but the claim of such being specifically healers is also a fallacy of later and modern fiction. Plenty of people who were neither Warlocks or Witches practiced various forms of folk medicines and remedies, some working better than others. That's not even unknown. 

 

The only real problem with either of these two titles comes from an old bias against Old English and Old Saxon language sources with the preference being imposed over and into that of Greek and Latin predominately as the languages of Academics and Scholars (such ans some where). As such there was a clear and still present demand to keep the proper meaning of the titles distorted and suppressed for only one reason. Keeping people ignorant which means keeping them easily manipulated into whatever is dropped before them and spoon fed to them to be accepted at face value without challenge.

 

We are those who do not play into this type of nonsense and as such give proper recognition that these two titles are just as important as any member of any religious Identity's Spiritual and Mundane leadership or clergy by any language, especially when taken seriously into such roles of providing proper guidance and factual information to the people for literally every aspect of life that matters to them, not necessarily the clergy and that is a major and key important feature often ignored by what amounts to those who are little more than cosplayers. 

The titles of Warlock or Witch are not frivolous:

Bearing such a title is a high honor and it is our intention to bring that sense of importance to them as they should have a very long time ago. This comes from the duties and abiding by them as a sacred oath of office as well as the opportunity to legitimately help others to gain proper knowledge, perspective  and understanding of the most fundamental wisdom of spiritual, theological and philosophic traditions of the culture and its various influences for its development. This also most certainly, and often is under appreciated that this also includes emotional and psychological problems people may face as well as helping them find or realize a sense of true personal meaning in their lives and life experiences. Those are not things that should be screwed around with.

The life of any clergy of any culture has never been easy:

It has required living as a hermit for some, foregoing the consolations of marriage and family life for others, receiving an income far below what one’s level of education would command, and practicing a demanding form of obedience and commitment to one's calling for the welfare of others and not themselves. It has also always had some degree of risk to life and limb regardless the particular culture and various rival movements, new or old diametrically opposed to one another yet trying to coexist, often unsuccessfully, in the same space. It's not unique to anyone or any culture or a problem that is predominately a religious issue. that's another fairly modern fiction imposed.

Difficulties in a so called more open and more enlightened global society have not decreased but increased for everyone, more so between the 1960s to present, and the quality of such leadership has also sorely plummeted. That's not something to be proud of regardless the identity. More so considering that within every culture such clergy or spiritual or religious leaders were actually the most well educated and learned men and women for several millennia. The vast majority of lay people lacked even rudimentary education. Unfortunately the vast majority of lay people lacking rudimentary education has come back in spades.

 

In any case, this was the very reason such clergy or religious leaders were generally respected for their understanding of matters both secular and sacred and had to prove their knowledge through intense study and research, and also intense exams and cross examinations before getting any sort of title, and they enjoyed a special status among believers and non believers alike. They also had to demonstrate their commitment to honestly though that requirement had been in decline for centuries already and also unfortunately. Yet as more of the lay people also became better educated so did the clergy contrary to those who claim an educated public somehow lowered the significance of such in their communities. 

 

That's not the cause for such declines. Its way more complicated than that and in many cases its self inflicted internally rather than from objections externally. One of the major self inflicted wounds is abuse of power and authority and imposing and demanding in many cases that the common people main dependent upon them solely rather than adapting with the people’s intellectual independence growth, even in matters of religious judgment and belief and started engaging in more manipulative tendencies to try and hold onto the illusions of power for the wrong reasons.

 

Frankly its not a factor that their spiritual guidance was less valued by many educated people. It's more of a factor that more openly and better educated people simply became more empowered to see through the hypocrisy and imposed bullshit. People of even the most educated tiers of society still seek some sort of spiritual guidance. They seek spiritual as well as intellectual stimulation without all the unnecessary extras and just want some full on honesty and unfortunately seldom find it. They become burned out reasonably enough and as such have a hard time relating to the fortunate few that have found it because their trust has been violated too much. That's the reality.

Of course there is the extremist anti-religious Marxist style rhetoric that also engages in its own host of lies and various parody movements that not only pretend and try and convince everyone of the soundness of their conclusions but proceed to also proclaim a blatant fallacy that being an "atheist" or "non-theist" makes one automatically smarter. Clearly it doesn't. Consider this as its own proof. Atheism has increased for a variety of reasons yet academically people have proven to have become dumber just between he time period of the 1990s CE to present.

 

These are the same who are blind to the fact that with the advent of occultism and psychology and their mergers as occult-psychology had challenged both religion and philosophy for ascendancy in providing guidance about life and living. We have likewise seen more prevalent abuses of people mentally, emotionally and psychology from occultism and psychology or its merged form of occult-psychology that has taken hold in the areas of politics, education, government and more or less everything else with the same amount if not more so the very hypocrisy and fictions it pretended to confront. Most lay people, especially impressionable minds and emotions of children are blind to this fact also.

Of course most will deny this, yet one only has to look into such as Carl Gustav Jun, along with others sought to do just that. Merge the occult and psychology and completely ignoring the fact that much of occultism was based on distortion and further corruption of old theological concepts and abandoned philosophies that lacked actual value or consistency in their premises to their conclusions. You can investigate that yourself. Even the so called Myers-Briggs personality types test is an example of this kind of mental manipulation.  Review these two videos for yourself:

Other Important Notes:

One should be aware that there are a lot of other claimed alternative titles for Warlock and Witch and they are all false. In fact, they seldom if ever cite their sources when the facts contradict their claims. In any case we can proceed from isolating the most common claimed alternatives and demonstrate why they are indeed false as well. Much of it comes out of traditions not aware of the sources and the original context of such things. In any case we will keep them to the point and specific for simple reference.

​​​

  1. Wizard: From Wysar. Derived Latin ‘viser’ as in adviser (to view/to see implying a sense of clarity of mind as in wise one). The Source is Promptorium Parvulorum: Bilingual English to Latin dictionary (“Storehouse for children”) completed around 1440 CE. Other spellings included wyser, wizer, weser, wysard, wysarde, wyseard, wisard, wyssard, wissard, wiseard, vizard, and wizzard.  It came to be used as a term for a philosopher or sage and later replaced by the word scientist.

  2. Witan: From Witegan (means Witness when reduced to Witnas and Wednes). The Source is The Homilies of the Anglo-Saxon Church by Ælfric of Eynsham; 955-1010 CE. Other Spellings included  wītega, wītga, witna, widnes, wednes, witnes, wītiga, witiȝe, witege, witega, witegæ, witeȝe, witeȝa, witeȝæ, witigan, witeȝan, witien, witiȝe, witȝin, witeies, witege, witegene, witegena, and witegane. The term witangemot, contrary to later nonsense, meant a meeting of witnesses, especially in a court and akin to the later concept of a jury of peers.

  3. Shaman: Saman, from sama- (same) Dutch saman, to German schamane and Russian Shaman. It is the source of the identifier used by those who came to call themselves the Sami because the meaning is “same.”  It is a well established fact that beyond a few superficial trappings, everything else associated with so called Shamanism is based upon outright fraud, misrepresentation and shoddy scholarship as an invented "universal" religion. The imagery was inspired by a wood cut by Nicolaes Witsen, a Dutch Explorer who encountered people still practicing old traditions in Siberia and surrounding regions in 1692, which he made a woodcut image of, and called a man dressed in animal hides, bear claws and wearing antlers “the same priest of the Devil.” It featured conical tents in the background, a little dog leaping around the man playfully, while he holds a drum stick and playing a ceremonial drum.

  4. Mage/Magic/Magi/Magician: It does not mean things like Power or Might. Its from Persian Magus (Magoosh) meaning Servant in the sense of being humble and not in a slavery sense. It later becomes almost exclusively associated with Zoroastrianism despite predating it but all ultimately later Greek and Roman Latin reinterpretations. 

  5. Spae: Its not a female based term or an alternative to Witch. Spae is from spä (spy). Later it became spie giving way to the p[resent form spy meaning more or less “watch, look at, observe." It is derived fro  Latin specular; short form spec. Spacræft (spy craft) was simply considered a cowardly practice because it did not involve directly facing and challenging a rival, and also regarded as an act of treason just as it is now.  A male spy was called spaehan from older spakan more or less “he-spy.” A female spy was called Spaehona from the older spakona more or less a "she-spy. " That is all there is to the meaning.

  6. Völva: Völva is a false and fairly modern invention from the word Volva in Latin meaning Roll Up as in revolve and is not Norse or Icelandic as has often been claimed. Adding the hyphens is just an example of psychological manipulation to make somethinh look more authentic when its not. Its first known usage in relation to women associated with spinning occurs in the Ephraim Chambers' Cyclopaedia published of 1753 after its initial 2 volume publications in 1728. So its not Old Norse or Icelandic.

  7. Sorcerer: From Old Latin Sors-(separate) becoming sort. The feminine is sorceress. Simply put the original meaning was a person who sorted out/separated lots as in stones used to count votes.  Methods included voters putting their hands and arms in two jars representing yes or no for a vote and keeping it hidden which hand they placed a stone handed to them. The other method was taking a stone like a lottery more or less (notice lottery means a "lot") where names would be written on stones , placed in ajar that would be rotated with a stick after shaken up, and the name that popped out first was considered to be a winner or "chosen one" for whatever the purpose was.

  8. Witch Doctor: Witch Doctor actually an intentional insult. It is sometimes claimed to be a counterpart to Witch and alternative to Warlock. This is entirely false. It was originally a term for fake doctors and those initiating Witch Hunts and Heresy Hunters as a condemnation of such things. The source of this term was Francis Hutchinson, a Bishop, who coined the term in his work ‘An Historical Essay concerning Witchcraft,’ published in 1718. Unfortunately it was also mostly in his writings at that time that we also see the over generalizations being imposed and applied as well with little to no care in meaning or context or source of the words themselves. However, he kept the genders at least relatively intact. ​

What Druwayu isn't:

Druwayu is not "pagan, heathen, mystical or occult." Neither am I a pagan, heathen, mystic or occultist. If some claim I am they are lying to themselves and to you. I reject and have always rejected such things but have used the words in acts of mockery before which is not the same as identifying as or with such. Only the profoundly stupid make such conclusions. In fact, such associations are rejected for many reasons but the main one is false definitions and historical nonsense that comes out of these circles. Furthermore it is not based in any of them even if some of these identities have drawn from similar sources or their own invented content. To clarify why these are rejected is as follows:

  1. Pagan means bound one. It is from Latin Pagus (bound one) akin to peg, from pag (bound/placed/fixed). Occurs also I the word ‘page used as a term to mean a servant and also a slave (a.k.a. one in bondage).  It does not mean country dweller at all. Calling oneself a pagan is along the same lines as calling oneself a bound servant as in a slave.

  2. Heathen simply means one from a Heath. A heath is shrub land with poor quality soil and came to be used pejoratively to also mean a poor quality person. It was also applied to semi nomadic people that followed herds like caribou that would migrate during the warmer seasons to such heaths and birth their young before migrating again for the shelter of old pine forests and mountain ranges rather than open plains and pastures. Calling oneself a heathen is like claiming to be a shrub.

  3. Mystical is used to mean "unknown" when in actuality it means "unspoken" in the sense of mute. In fact its actually derived from the same roots in Greek. This is the basis for it being used in the context of "secrecy" and why many such mystical occultists use the hush finger gesture as a visual reference to that and they basis behind required "levels of initiation" for all sorts of silly nonsense. We don't have such "initiations." We teach who want to learn or leave it alone.

  4. Occult means hidden from sight. Its in fact a combination of 'oc' meaning "see/sight" and as in  celare "conceal/hidden" in Latin and oc is the root of oculus often used in a sense of eye hut also in the sense of opening (especially in a roof that allowed light to enter a room to make everything visible). We do not hide anything from anyone or use something else as a cover and pretend to be one thing while being something else which is the the tendency of all occult orders and movements. Its not an alternative of mystical which is why sold fraternities often called themselves the "mystical and occult order of whatever."

We do not Parody other Regions:

 

A parody religion is created with superficial intentions to mock, insult and even exaggerate the religious and  spiritual convictions of others. We may engage openly is self parody, as we do from time to time and may parody various stereotypes. However, we do not target those outside of Druwayu because it is often over done and far too often just another boring and childish passing fad.  

  • The reason is as we view it is it is indeed no different than the same nonsense persecuting other religious groups during events like the Inquisition, various heresy hysterics in Europe and Colonial America and the Satanic Panic of the 1980s (which hasn't entirely gone away).

  • Those claiming its not the same are viewed as being deceived and/or being deceitful with themselves and other for the same claims of some sort of moral or ethical high ground while engaging in similar activities are disavowed.

  • It is the same sort of claimed ethical and moral high ground that was an is the claim of all who engage in such persecutions with the same core motivations; to denounce and invalidate the views, opinions and beliefs of others with whom you do not agree and promoting hostility that leads to violence inevitably. 

​​

Druans, nor the Drusidu, will engage in or tolerate the rhetoric of social-political correctness or other imposed culture. Just as Druwayu is not imposed upon others we will not allow Druwayu to be imposed upon and will speak and express ourselves as we choose to do so in accordance with our own autonomous self determination. In other words, we do not have to and will not be forced to conform because of some movement demands it. This is also in line with Druwayu by being True to Ourselves.

We embrace Personal Expression to a point


Literary, artistic, theological and philosophical interpretations of Druwayu is embraced and encouraged among all who embrace Druwayu itself and can maintain the basic awareness and act that Druwayu is not "whatever" you want it to be, and not a haphazardly thrown together tradition and that such personal expressions do not fall off into the realm of nonsense and intentional abnormality. 

Druwayu is not Ethnocentric


Unlike too many other things to count, Druwayu is not a ethnocentric separatist identity or movement. We welcome anyone and everyone regardless what their skin pigment happens to be or what country they originated from. Furthermore we do not advocate or support the nonsense of equating language to race or Nationalism (pride in one's nation) as synonymous with racism. If that is what one is seeking here or from Druwayu they can move on.

Terms we do not use

Some of the most commonly used terms associated with Warlocks and Witches falsely and mostly from those who follow things spun out of the Occult movements of the early to mod 1900s we do not use. In fact, where some of them are really derived is not very honorable, some of it is just nonsense and some of it is funny.  That said, the main ones to note are:

  1. No Sabbaths:  The word comes from the Hebrew Sabbat pronounced Shab-bot.  It is a culturally specific observation from Judaism as well as Early Christianity that hadn’t complete slit off from its Jewish roots as an end of the week observance, modern Saturday, with the base meaning “day of rest.” The term of the so called “Witches Sabbath” doesn’t actually show up till after 1613.

  2. No Black Mass: The first complete depiction of a perversion and parody of the Catholic Mass as the “Black Mass.” was given in Florimond de Raemond's 1597 French work, The Antichrist (written as a Catholic response to the Protestant claim that the Pope was the Antichrist).

  3. No Esbats: Es-bat meaning literally “to beat.” It comes ultimately from Latin a- (ad ‘to, at’) + batre ‘beat’ (battere, battuere ‘beat’) as abate, and Modern French ébat. It’s a tongue in cheek reference to masturbation, hence the intentional misleading claims of it meaning “to frolic and amuse oneself (play with oneself), and a diversion.”

  4. No Covens: The word coven is from the 1200s (CE) source forms of covent, cuvent, and means  an "association or community of persons devoted to religious life," from Anglo-French covent, from Old French convent, covent "monastery, religious community," from Latin conventus "assembly," used in Medieval Latin for "religious house," from which convent and convention as terms are also derived.  It is not until the early 1609 by way of the work called the Masque of Queenes (literally meaning Mask of Queens) that any association with any Warlocks and Witches starts being applied or implied.

  5. No Grimoires: Not at least in the sense of claim of being a book of “magic” and all that nonsense. The fact is the word Grimoire is French and means Grammar Book as a text book for learning proper Latin, as well as such things as Greek and Hebrew. The only “Spells” were literally the spellings and pronunciation and meaning of said words. Naturally such also contained theological and philosophical references. It was from Occultist sources that the term Book of Shadows was coined which originally referred to practices in India reading omens from shadows produced by smoke and heat vapors on walls. Furthermore, those who were accused of being Warlocks and Witches were often illiterate and poor farm people so would not have had such things in the first place because they wouldn't have been able to read them anyways.

Short History of some of the False Information Sources and ongoing Lies:

Its a known fact that people like Gerald Gardner and his groupies more or less were all occultists or or less plagiarizing one another. Gardner created his Bricket Wood Coven in Bricket Wood, England after he met up with a group of low level Rosicrucian who previous got together and predominately a group of women that gathered in New Forest, England based on its old previous folklore and history using the Occultism of the time and New Age Movement that was rampant all over Europe in the 1910s-1930s.

 

  1. They were basing their cult on the claims of Margaret Murray's books such as "The God of the Witches" published in 1917 which pulled the whole Horned God bit as a deity of paleolithic times to the medieval period with the link to more or less any and all figures with horned headdresses, and then "The Witch Cult of Western Europe" published in 1921 which pulled the whole Moon Goddess bit which made claims of associations with the cult of Diana s "Western Europe."

  2. Lewis Spence is one of the main sources also of some shoddy scholarship who applied the false claim in his 1920 book "An An Encyclopedia of Occultism" Old English wicca (masculine), wicce (feminine), wiccian (verb)” and yet its clear that is completely false.

  3. He chose to ignore the actual language sources in his fabrications like many others also engaging in similar nonsense but also became the basis behind Gardner's blind acceptance and assumptions showing he was not all that concerned with better research but its also from such claims as Lewis Spence that the OED simply added it without fact checking and which other dictionaries blindly absorb and redistribute as if its an established fact despite clear rules of linguistics and etymology have been violated to impose such trash.

  4. These were "suggested reading" for Gardner as it was these who more or less gathered around him early on because of his occult interests and other claims and especially since he started having an affair with one of the female cult members. He had also already been involved with more infamous occultists like Aleister Crowley who "initiated" him into his cult concepts such as Thelema and gave him the "Book of the Law" which was lifted whole clothe by Gardner into his mishmash occultism.

  5. Also contrary to modern feminist extremists and gender neutral whatever crap claims, B.S. claims, he and his cult did also use the title Warlock and imposed a concept of reincarnation use to invent a myth that he and his "secret female lover" were being reborn through time and gender swapping through the ages to further fuel their own delusional justifications and all that despite the known fact that Aleister Crowley had his own bias against anyone referring to themselves either a Warlock or a Witch, not that it matters that much considering the hack and shock fiend he really was playing off the ignorance of others even by his own admissions.    

  6. About the 1960s one of his fem-groupies named Doreen Valiente was the more critical and outspoken against Gardner and eventually sought to "purge" the cult of Gardner's and his male participants influences more or less circling back to the cult created by the former Rosicrucian female cult members in the 1960s and was even interviewed once on camera claiming the "reason her Goddess Diana" didn't show herself was because the deity was "shy." Sane people recognized the BS but most have sought to suppress that fact.

  7. She went on to push more feminist ideas and also invented the whole concept of Warlock being a Scottish word for men "of the craft" and Witch was an English word for women "of the craft" more or less never citing the source o her claims. it was also she who got to re-write most of the claims about the etymology in the OED where she continued to impose the false pejoratives on the male titles while claiming the same treatment of the word Witch was unjustified. In other words she was imposing her own sexist feminist rhetoric that paved the way for more bullshit later. 

  8. Extremist feminists like nothing more than to impose their nonsense into everything they touch and far to many have turned towards spineless cowardice to challenge the babbling nonsense that frankly was not a reality of concept till such started further inserting themselves into such subject as these in the 1970s was particularly true that in the 1970s some more extremist anti-male misandrist feminists formed their own "lesbian witch cults."

  9. Knowing full damn well it was a female title and word and counterpart to Warlock, it also absorbed into the occultism and psychological manipulation being pushed through various college campuses of the time that it also derived and mixed the occultism with early extremist feminist Marxist socialists who called themselves "W.I.T.C.H." in 1968 which is the primary source of the largely fictional "anti-female patriarchy" and modern culture war and the so called "war of the sexes" that was even mocked in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

  10. Some also used the charges for engaging in various fortune telling practices without a license as a claim of violation of religious rights and freedoms and used the civil rights movement of the time to push it further among the predominate gay and lesbian communities though later gays were angered because it was directed to intentionally recruit more lesbians and bisexual women into such cults which left many disenfranchised but that's how scams work. This occurred mostly in New York and California.

  11. In Salem Massachusetts chose to slightly lighten up but only a little and instead added the contingency they would allow men in only if they were homosexuals and they had to adopt feminine names and titles and devote themselves completely to their "female deity" (usually Dianna) based off the crap claims of Margaret Murry that was claimed to be "embodied" in the "High Priestess."

  12. Still kept as largely exclusive little cults with some of the more extreme ones around Satanism and Aliens and various other so called Christian and other Mystical sects, and fr more openly racist movements pretending to be about "racial equality" when in reality its always been the same separatist bullshit and delusions that has always been used to divide, control and brainwash people in such a way as to cause them to brainwash themselves, the 1980s "Satanic Panic" was created by the same who used Mainstream Media to get more attention on  the occult insanity.

  13. Then playing into the same game of controlled opposition, they used it to promote themselves and reintroduce the insanity pushing more extreme feminist crap with pretty songs and convenient lies playing the victims persecution crap while themselves actually doing the persecutions, but didn't get their full wider range imposed garbage till the more directly perpetuated bullshit under the New Age movement of the late 1980s and early part of the 1990s was able to take some hold and then used the internet of the 1990s to spread it wider and further.

  14. Its been further distorted ever since and funneled through mainstream media outlets, especially those out of New York and California in every genre. And that's just one part of it and all the sickness involved which has also come into include the perpetuation of a female deity as the primary entity as the main focus of all these fronts associated with turn men into women and women into men and turning them against one another and encouraging acts of self mutilation and a known history of being among such deities that have a long and sick history of demands for infanticide and human sacrifice of one's own people and children. Sorry, but we cannot get behind all that crap with is another reason why Druwayu is very different and does not draw off of such ugly and deplorable constructs that are hardly worth pretending are "redeemable."

  15. As for those that get pissy over the use of the title Warlock who derive al their crapola ultimately from such as Gerald Gardern and one of his many groupies that eventually ran off to do their own thing and started gripping about everything and then girlified it and imposed misandrist feminist bullshit in the mix, the so called "Book of Shadows" Gardner invented as a "term" used Warlock in reference to a man who performed "ritual binding" which basically was bondage style kink fetishism pretending to be "necessary" ritual as it drew from Freemasonry's initiation rites, sword and all, but of course had everyone do that in the nude and did actually recommend sex rituals drawn heavily from Crowley's own perversions.

​As such one can see most clearly the abundant hypocrisy we see in modern times is not that modern, certainly hasn't diminished and the only ones pushing back on these facts are childish drones stuck in their own fantasy loops and play acting while turning such fraud and foolishness into some sort of money grab and regurgitating the same lies over and over again on all sides. 

 

bottom of page