THE DECEPTIONS

The conceptual image of the Hermaphrodite that is common to nearly all the various expressions of Medieval Alchemy and Occult ideology that proposed the concept that the primary goal was to overcome particular states of matter through the union of opposites (male and female, light and dark, good and evil) in a sense of "transcending" the physical and ascending to a Divine Androgynous State.

Part of this comes from two primary sources: a mistranslation of the of man and woman in Genesis, and therefore by intent to claim the first man Adam was a hermaphrodite before Eve was created (which is a bluring of two different stories, and the intentional distortions of some Rabbis on purpose to then claim their deity was and is a He-she so "it" needs no mate or consort thus imposing monotheism, and the other from additional outside Greek sources such as Pythagoreanism.

For sake of Argument, the original singular word Adam is ancient. The plural is Adamu/Adama with the feminine being Adamah and can be found in such as ancient Sumerian Texts. Second, the singular name for the male deity was El, the feminine Elah and plural Elohim, however, the same Rabbis imposed the deception Elohim could be used as a plural or singular yet does not apply such to other entities with the "im" plural suffix.

The reality is, all the references to said deities forced into a fictional singular one when there are clear and well plurals, and the same then being imposed upon people ignores the language of the source materials and factual archeology that shows these are dictions perpetuating the deception that the "first mythical man, like their deity were both dual gendered as in both being a He-she. The dual-gendered nature of the human or deity in both cases are blatant frauds. We can, however, find some sources for these concepts being pooled together to remake a religion with a single deity represented by a single ruler over the people, represented by a clergy that would proclaim said ruler and incarnation of such a fictional being based solely on "reproductive prowess." We can break this down most clearly here in this example of how this has been pawned off for centuries.

A lot of examples of Occult Ideology stem from Pythagoreanism taking the concept of Aion, originally represented as a male deity, applying it as more of an abstract concept meaning life-span, which is where both the words Awen and Eon originate with the same meaning and coming up with the idea of a male side as Theo, a female side as Thea, that their union called Enosis which means Union brings "secret knowledge and "knowing someone" also used figuratively for sex, are likewise broken into other concepts such as the One Theo/Male/God (Divine Masculine) side linked to Samael and the Devil, the Thea/Female/Goddess (Divine Feminine) side linked to the darker concepts of Samael and Lilith as well as The Devil and The She-Devil. This is carried on in the Pythagorean cult concepts that eventually came to be remade and redesigned to be the twisted backdrop of what came to be known as Kabballah or Jewish Mysticism. These in turn produce a Third Person, often called the Demiurge.

Some later interpretations of Pythagoreanism, particularly those influenced by Neoplatonism or preserved in fragmentary sources, do introduce a cosmological triad that resembles a trinity. This idea may stem from a synthesis of Pythagorean number mysticism with Greek mythology and metaphysical speculation. Also be aware of the fact that

The earliest known use of the noun Zeus is in the late 1500s. OED's earliest evidence for Zeus is from 1587, in a translation by Sir Philip Sidney, author and courtier, and Arthur Golding, translator of the Latin form Deus.

Here’s how this could align with your reference:

Impersonal Aeon as the Primordial Unity
- In this context, the "Impersonal Aeon" could be equated with Aiôn (Eternity), a concept of infinite, boundless time or the eternal source beyond ordinary existence. This aligns with Pythagorean reverence for the Monad—the singular, indivisible principle of unity. Some sources suggest Aiôn as a transcendent deity or state that precedes and generates all subsequent beings. In this context, the "Impersonal Aeon" could be equated with Aiôn (Eternity), a concept of infinite, boundless time or the eternal source beyond ordinary existence. This aligns with Pythagorean reverence for the Monad—the singular, indivisible principle of unity. Some sources suggest Aiôn as a transcendent deity or state that precedes and generates all subsequent beings. In the earliest Pythagorean framework, this could represent an eternal, unchanging principle akin to the boundless source of existence—an idea possibly borrowed from Orphic cosmogonies or Egyptian theology (e.g., the concept of Nun, the primordial waters). It’s not a "deity" with personality but a state of infinite potential, resonating with Pythagoras’ reputation as a mystic attuned to cosmic origins.
Kronos (Cronus) and Rhea as the First Duality
- From this primordial unity, the Aeon "splits" or emanates into Kronos and Rhea, who represent the Monad (unity) and the Indefinite Dyad (multiplicity), respectively. Kronos, the Titan associated with time, embodies stability and order, while Rhea, his consort, embodies the flowing, generative principle of matter and multiplicity. This duality mirrors the Pythagorean fascination with opposites (e.g., light/dark, male/female) emerging from a single source. Kronos, the Titan associated with time, embodies stability and order, while Rhea, also a Titan and his consort, embodies the flowing, generative principle of matter and multiplicity. This duality mirrors the Pythagorean fascination with opposites (e.g., light/dark, male/female) emerging from a single source. Kronos (Time) and Rhea (Flowing/Mother) emerge as a primal pair, reflecting a division of the Aeon into temporal order and generative power. This aligns with early Greek mythological traditions Pythagoras might have encountered in Magna Graecia (southern Italy), where his sect was based. In Hesiod’s Theogony (c. 1200 BCE, but widely known by Pythagoras’ time), Kronos and Rhea are Titans who produce the next generation of gods, suggesting a cosmological process of emanation rather than a mathematical split.
The Third Offspring (Zeus/Deus or Logos)
- The "third offspring" could be Zeus, born of Kronos and Rhea in Greek mythology, who in this esoteric framework becomes the articulated expression of the divine order—the Logos or the harmonizing principle. This triad in this esoteric framework becomes the articulated expression of the divine order—the Logos or the harmonizing principle. In some Pythagorean-inspired texts, Zeus is seen as the demiurge or craftsman who organizes the cosmos using the Ideas (Forms) derived from his parents. This triad—Kronos (Father), Rhea (Mother), Zeus (Son)—parallels a trinity where the third member completes the creative process who organizes the cosmos using the Ideas (Forms) derived from his parents. The offspring—likely Zeus in this triad—represents the synthesis or fulfillment of the cosmic order, a ruler who brings structure to the universe. This could tie to Pythagorean ideas of harmony (not yet expressed mathematically) as a divine principle, possibly influenced by Orphic hymns where Zeus emerges as the organizer of the world.

These early sources, from the 6th and early 5th centuries BCE, paint Pythagoras as a sage, miracle-worker, and founder of a communal sect with strict ethical rules (e.g., vegetarianism, silence, shared property). Mathematics, the Tetractys, and the "Music of the Spheres" emerge in later accounts—particularly from the 4th century BCE onward with Philolaus and Archytas, or through Plato’s idealization of Pythagorean ideas in works like the Timaeus. The mathematical focus likely developed as a later hallmark of the Pythagorean school, not its original core.

Source and Context

This specific trinity isn’t explicitly detailed in the earliest Pythagorean fragments (e.g., from Philolaus or Archytas) but appears in later Pythagorean theology as synthesized by thinkers like the Neoplatonist Proclus (5th century CE) or in works like the Chaldean Oracles, which blend Pythagorean, Platonic, and Hellenistic ideas. For instance:

The Aeon more or less becomes associated as the Monad,
Kronos and Rhea become the Dyad with their power to multiply,
Deus or the Logos as the synthesis of the Dyad that manifests the cosmos becomes the Demiurge (later made ignorant and considered evil by the Gnostics).
The Chaldean Oracles (fr. 26) refer to a "Threefold Monad," which some scholars connect to Pythagorean influence, suggesting a triune structure emerging from a single source.

Pythagoras and his followers’ association with mathematics and number mysticism, as that’s the legacy is most prominently presented by later Greek philosophers like Plato and Aristotle. However, the earliest accounts of Pythagoras and his community—closer to his lifetime (c. 570–495 BCE)—focus more on his role as a mystic, religious leader, and ethical teacher rather than a mathematician. This predates later concepts of Christian and Catholic trinitarian doctrines. The later occult version of the "Cosmic 10 Nodes of Manifest Creation" are often expressed in things like the Kabbalah which claims to be over 4000 years old, however, the reality is it didn't exist till the 13th century CE. Occultists are not noted for their honesty in such matters. These "Cosmic Ten" are called the Sephiroth and the connecting lines, when not arranged in a single triangle of 10 nodes is rearranged on purpose, much later, as three sets of three = 9, and "the foundation/world/cosmos" as the 10th.

1. The Monad (The One)

Rather than worshipping anthropomorphic gods, Pythagoreans revered the Monad, a metaphysical concept representing unity, the source of all things, and the first principle of existence. It was symbolized by a single point or the number 1.
The Monad wasn’t a deity with a personality but an abstract divine essence—an eternal, indivisible origin from which all numbers (and thus all reality) emanated. It held a sacred status as the root of cosmic harmony.

2. Numbers as Divine Entities

Pythagoreans saw numbers themselves as sacred and imbued with divine significance. Each number had a spiritual quality or power:
- 1 (Monad): Unity by absence of opposites and the divine source.
- 2 (Dyad): Duality, opposition, and the first step of differentiation.
- 3 (Triad): Harmony and completeness (e.g., beginning, middle, end).
- 4 (Tetrad): Justice and the material world, linked to the Tetractys (see below).
- 10 (Decad): Perfection and the sum of 1+2+3+4, encapsulating the cosmos.
Treated with reverence, they were presented as a conceptual structure of the universe and its divine order (10 + the void for 11, later veiled in some scientists of today as the 11 dimensions of the universe).

3. The Tetractys

The Tetractys, a triangular arrangement of ten points (1 at the top, then 2, 3, and 4 below), was a central symbol of Pythagorean belief. It represented the harmony of the cosmos and the progression of creation through numbers.
They swore oaths by the Tetractys, invoking it as a sacred entity: “By him who gave us the Tetractys, which contains the fount and root of eternal nature.” This suggests it was a stand-in for a divine principle or the Pythagorean "godhead," possibly linked to their founder, Pythagoras, as a semi-divine figure.

4. Cosmic Harmony and the Music of the Spheres

The Pythagoreans believed the universe was governed by mathematical ratios, expressed in the "Music of the Spheres"—inaudible harmonies produced by celestial bodies in motion. This wasn’t tied to a specific deity but to a divine intelligence inherent in the cosmos.
Some scholars suggest they might have associated this harmony with a universal divine force, though not personified like traditional Greek gods.

5. Pythagoras as a Semi-Divine Figure

Pythagoras himself was venerated by his followers, sometimes described as a divine man or an incarnation of wisdom. Legends claimed he was the son of Apollo or had a golden thigh, hinting at a semi-divine status. However, he wasn’t worshipped as a god but as a teacher who revealed divine truths.
His role as the founder and the one who "delivered" the Tetractys elevated him to a near-mythic status within the community.

The earliest mentions of Pythagoras come from his contemporaries or near-contemporaries in the 6th and 5th centuries BCE, such as Xenophanes, Heraclitus, and Herodotus, as well as later but still pre-Platonic sources like Ion of Chios. However, it known they never met such a person named Pythagoras which is now considered to have been an invented founder. These accounts, fragmentary as they are, portray him primarily as a charismatic figure tied to religious and mystical practices rather than mathematics:

Xenophanes (c. 570–475 BCE)
- A poet and philosopher, Xenophanes mocks Pythagoras for his belief in the transmigration of souls (metempsychosis), claiming he once recognized the soul of a friend in a dog’s cry. This suggests Pythagoras was known early on for spiritual doctrines, not numbers.
Heraclitus (c. 535–475 BCE)
- Heraclitus criticizes Pythagoras as a polymath with “much learning” (polumathie) but accuses him of crafting his own wisdom, implying he was a synthesizer of esoteric knowledge rather than a mathematician at this stage.
Herodotus (c. 484–425 BCE)
- In his Histories (Book II), Herodotus links Pythagoras to Egyptian priests and their rituals, noting his adoption of practices like abstaining from woolen clothing. This ties him to a religious and ascetic tradition, not a mathematical one.
Ion of Chios (c. 490–420 BCE)
- Ion, a poet, mentions Pythagoras in connection with poetic and ethical teachings, possibly linking him to Orphic traditions, but makes no reference to geometry or numbers.

THE SO-CALLED PYTHAGOREAN DECAD

The most common question is then, who is the personification of the world, cosmos if this is true? Gaia, also called Hera and also expressed as the Bride and the Earth Mother. What many fail to recognize is the Greeks, Romans and others did not have a true formalized pantheon, such as those attempted by Homer's Iliad and Odyssey or Hesiod's Theogony in the 8th century BCE. This is also echoed in many respects to interpretations of Plato as Platonism, which is part of the vital structure of Christian theology.

It cannot be ignored that Deus/Logos/Zeus as the Son and third person of the impersonal Aeon/Aion is applied to Iēsous, later Latin as Iesus where the word Jesus comes from after the 1500s, and itself said to be based off the Hebrew and Aramaic Yashua. This Yashua was also linked to the Pythagorean Apollonius of Tyana, an ancient Greek philosopher and miracle worker, and the tendency of Pythagoreans to use the name Apollonius as a name also associated with Pythagoras as reincarnations of Apollo.

Consider the fact most intentionally hide because of the connections and implications:

Pythagoras as a person is often claimed to be an incarnation of the deity Apollo.
Apollo, also spelled Apollonius, renamed as Apollyon, all meaning destroys/destroyer.
Apollo is associated with the Oracle of Delphi, renamed in legend due to his arrival there on a Dolphin.
Delphi was originally named Pythia. Pythia is the Ancient Greek word "pythō," means "rot/rotten."
A name for Apollo also is
The word Pytho is the source of the name Python as the slain serpent cast into the pit, after Apollo slew it and took over Python's former home and oracle.
Python means "rotten/decay" and is associated with the stink from the poisonous gases at the Oracle of Delphi.
Pythagoras is said to have been given this name after his father (of which there are different claims who that was, including Apollo himself) visited the Oracle of Delphi.
Ancient Greek "Agora" means "gathering" and used for a Market place and a prefix forming such words as agri-culture; and also Latinized or Romanized as agorá. It's also used figuratively for "council" (not counsel).

Pythagoras would literally mean "Rotten Council." Figuratively his name would be "The Serpent Council" in that sense as the cult of the serpent is well imbedded in Greek mythology. So much so Deus/Zeus, among his many forms to "seduce mortal women and create hybrid demi-gods" also assumed the form of a serpent, and likewise the symbol of the double serpents later applied as the staff of Hermes, the Caduceus. It makes its manifestation many times, including in the so-called Bronze Serpent and supernatural beings called seraphim as flying fiery serpents.

As a symbol of the connections with "Earth and Sky" also represent the duality of the serpent being a symbol wisdom, fertility, and divine power, in the form of the Caduceus with its twin snakes, and often mistaken as a medical symbol due to later erroneous interpretations, it has long been a multifaceted symbol, representing healing, medicine, wisdom, and immortality, but also destruction, mortality, sickness and the underworld.

Another important note, which is also never mentioned, is that there are 9 specific deities often called Ennead from the Ancient Greek word enneás (ἐννεάς), meaning "the nine", as personifications of the same Aion/Aeon given the names Kronos, Rhea, Hera, Deus/Zeus, Demeter, Hestia, Poseidon, Hades and Persephone as equivalents to the ancient Egyptian concepts of Nun as the Cosmic waters from which Atum emerged and eventually results in the formation of the other 8 deities Shu, Tefnut, Geb, Nut, Osiris, Isis, Set, and Nephthys.

It simply another adjusted form in some old attempts to create ultimately a loose sense of a base Pantheism and extended Polytheism which can be called a semi-monotheistic construct but not truly, because it's from these 9 from 1 = 10 that all the later subsequent other diverse deities are presented as being generated from with the eventual creation of human beings from the "tears of the Sun" later called by the heretical king Akhenaten the Aten, and likely a loose concept for Atum.

It is all, once again, another example of how some tried to impose an organized structure on thing that were never consistent and had many diverse myths about the same beings of diverse associations, and often being merged with others they were previously distinct from. It should also be clear that this was also, in part, the reason why Ancient Greeks and others didn't recognize or have or rejected the concept of 0/Zero/Nothing which is often not made clear that this was the original basis being the various sources "stated reasons" and where those reasons originated.

We can clearly achieve a better, more stable structure, which we find in many older sources in regard to such things where we have the concept of the Sevenfold Spirit of God counting the center and the Sixfold or hexagonal extensions representing the three-dimensional planes associated with width, length and depth, plus the directions such as above, center and below, plus front, back, left and right for simple reference which can also be expressed as 7 days of a week with the center being the starting and resting point; plus the three extensions of the three Goddesses often associated with time as well such as the times of the old three seasons (rather than four) of Winter, Spring and Summer, and in connection with them four specific months, which is 5 for each Goddess x 3 = 15. 15 + 7 for the manifestation of God = 22. It's no accident that writing systems from such as the Phoenicians = 22 letters as consonants and no vowels, which in turn served as the basis for Hebrew letters. Then A, E, I, O, U, and Y were added.

At least that was the general sense, though over time letters also with vowels were added and removed over time depending on the specific languages that began using the Phoenician base forms more frequently to fit their particular languages and dialect, whereas it inspired others later to create their own. As a side note, it's from this name Phoenician we get words like phonetics and phone expressing a sense of communication essentially. unfortunately, this also caused some disconnections with the previous foundations of those concepts and their roots in this One and Three Structure proper.

It should also be made clear the supreme deity of Phoenicians, Canaanites and many other Hebrew and Aramaic languages all placed often under the Semitic language lineages was Al/El, also called Al Alyon/El Elyon among other things, and as the "Father of all deities and humans alike, and creator of created things" as among his many titles within several diverse pantheons.
This is the same deity with three wives and said to have been the father of 72 children. If one thinks carefully about this, it equates to the concept of 72 hours. Each Goddess can therefore represent 3 Days. This would mean that in concept as well, each of these three wives bore him 24 children each as his 72 sons and daughters.
In other examples these same 72 children are broken down into 9 orders composed of 8 individuals aligned to the claimed 9 orders of angelic beings rather than as deities, yet they will try and erase the concept of the 3 Goddesses as consorts of the One God, despite that 3 x 3 = 9, or the fact that each of the three Goddesses are aligned in that system with 4 months, 4 x 3 = 12, 12 x 6 = 72 and can all be broken down back again into the same conceptual alignments such as 3 x 8 = 24, x 3 = 72.
In the center remains the 1 manifested through those 6 points. In addition, we also have another foundation of many key measurements called Decons which are sets of 3 x 12 = 36 and as 30 x 12 = 360, or alternatively 6 for God's manifested Spirit through the Three Goddesses in their primary forms as 1 season plus 4 months = 5 so that 6 x 5 = 30. This of course brings us back to the 1 and 3 = 4 and 4/72 = 18. 18 x 4 also = 72.
We can also use the math form of 7 for God in this form and the three Goddesses collectively added as 15 as 7 +15 = 22. The reason for this is because some sources mention 88 children of the 1 and 3 and 22 x 4 = 88, which is interesting in and of itself, though the standard tends to be primarily 72. Additionally, most to the names of these various secondary deities are lost to time, along with their specific associations, and of course, many were also fused and confused with one another even by modern researchers.

The point here is that the whole basis of these various ancient theologies didn't simply "invent" deities purely out of nothing. They were inspired from observations in nature with a recognition of a certain order and intelligence behind everything, while indeed some also included deified human ancestors which was more common and often resulting in even larger pantheons, complicated further when such were often named after particular patron or matron deities as a goal of protection of them as children and as guides for them through their mortal lives.

Also contrary to much of the modern nonsense often trying to present such as "alien beings" from another world rather than as cosmic beings as the sources and regulators of it as it was known or believed to be in ancient times, we find that the association with the stars tended to more frequently align with ancestors while planetary objects and other space debris like comets and meteors were associated with deities, sometimes many with the same objects and not seen as the same as the objects themselves. It varied of course. In any case we can proceed with other corruptions and remakes of the same kind of things derived from Pythagoreans and other philosophers like Plato and more.

As we can see, the characters are presented as Aion as "The Divine Essence" and the two persons are presented as Kronos the father and Rhea the mother. The Demiurge wo then creates the "imperfect world as the Logos" intended to be his own future wife and bride. Yet it is still essentially the third person of the One Aion has to eventually try and reconcile the world and humanity back to this Divine Order. In this case, it changes slightly where the man and the woman actually reject the Divine Will and do not desire to be mere hosts or shells through which the deity incarnates through simultaneously as a "holy redemption. It is this very basis of concepts which do have echoes among 1st century Christians, for example, is by large where the idea the "Holy Spirit" the active feminine energy, person and expression of the highest and holiest but in female form and likewise linked to the "Lady Wisdom texts that extreme feminists yellow about.

In this example, we have the common "idea" where on one hand the Jewish concept of Deity is considered both masculine and feminine in quality yet beyond the confines of gender in a "human" binary sense. Yet the same will contract themselves going back to the previous nonsense and claim their deity is reflected in the human and the first human was a he-she which is a known fiction. However, in several of the various mystical writings of much later Jewish mysticism such as the Kabballah (Kabb-allah), the singular name for the male is El, the female version is Elah and plural Elohim applies to both. As such some will go as far as to note that Elohim can be considered a masculine singular applied to a feminine plural while some completely delete the male and call it a feminine plural alone based on the masculine plural Elim. In any case, the same sources tend to not "like" a third being added so create this duality concept for their Yahu/Yahweh.

Drawing from these concepts as often presented in such as the Kabballah (Kabb-allah), that the Jewish Deity, or the Deity of Monotheism in general is a He-she, concluded that 'It' is a hermaphrodite. It was Eliphas Levi, a French Catholic and occultist, that in 1854, created this image of the so-called Baphomet, pronounced Baf-oh-may, which is something most get wrong, as composing that he also called the ‘Sabbatic Goat.’ It was meant to represent the union of opposing forces which in itself is a concept of chaos rather than order and was later adopted in 1966 as a symbol of the Philosophic Satan for the so-called Church of Satan created by Anton LaVey. Previously, the Occultist and mentally ill Aleister Crowley was among the first known occultists to have connected the Baphomet imagery with Satan and also proclaimed Satan is not the enemy of mankind, but an ally. However, this connection goes back even earlier and appears on several old tarot decks which themselves also are based on old carvings representing 'devils' as hermaphrodites in early Italian Tarot cards representing the confusion and corruption of nature. Rather than goat horns, antlers were attached to a cap, with its brim is folded to look like animal ears on Jean Dodal Tarot, 1701. All of this is derived from concepts of the 1300s.

We find this obscured yet present in the primary symbol of Freemasonry and various Masonic Temples. It's one of the more well-known fraternities of its type before it allowed for the inclusion of sororities, but all retain the same "he-she" concept of deity which is expressed in the symbolism. While not being the only Occult Order, this concept of "Deity" also includes the concept as the "Deity" of all mystical, occult and magical arts and sciences. This is where we see the clearest example of corruption of True Sacred Geometry by only referencing some of the rules while avoiding following them from start to finish and the basis behind most of the so called "sacred geometry" pushing the same twisted ideologies entwined into it, along with various elements of Pythagoreanism and Gnosticism. For clarity, the compass represents the tool used to draw out circles and circles or curved lines are female and feminine. The square, also called the ruler, is used to draw out straight lines which are as such male and masculine. The G in the is for Geometry and God, but also the deceit that God as a "A He-she Deity."

1. The Concept of Dual-Gender Deities

The idea of a single deity embodying both male and female attributes is a recurring theme in mystical and occult traditions. This belief often rests on the assumption that a deity must possess the reproductive powers of both binary genders. Such concepts underpin extreme practices within occultism, including the notion that females should aspire to androgyny and males should embrace emasculation—sometimes through self-castration—to adopt feminine traits. Historical examples, like the Galli priests of the ancient Roman mystery cults, devoted to the goddess Cybele and her consort Attis, illustrate this duality.

2. Historical Manifestations: The Galli Cult

The Galli were notorious for wearing women’s clothing and jewelry, practicing self-castration, and engaging in homosexual acts, particularly anal intercourse. Contrary to modern claims that Ancient Rome broadly accepted such behaviors, these actions defied Roman gender norms and were widely condemned. The Galli’s mythology centers on Cybele, a dual-gender deity who, after castration, gave rise to Attis. Cybele’s subsequent desire for Attis—her own offspring—fueled a cult of effeminate men and masculine women, blending gender roles in ways that shocked Roman society contrary to those who claim it was widely accepted.

The Galli also allowed for acts of extreme celibacy which also came to be absorbed into later Gnosticism and its various "methods" to prevent souls from becoming lured and trapped into the material universe. Gnosticism also barrows from the Pythagorean roots of Deus/Zeus/Logos being the evil Demi-urge, Rhea becomes merged with Cybele as the "Divine Feminine" and as yet another twist, Apollo becomes a Gnostic Jesus s either Kronos, or the Hidden One in the Aeon/Pleroma. It's all rather twisted and not as "enlightening" as its often claimed.

3. Modern Echoes in Feminist Cults

Diluted versions of these ideas persist in contemporary "goddess" cults tied to extremist feminist ideologies. These groups often perpetuate revisionist histories, casting the male gender as an unnatural aberration. Some draw symbolic parallels between figures like Attis—depicted in women’s attire with a solar crown—and the Statue of Liberty, citing its radiant headpiece. However, such connections are tenuous. The statue actually represents Libertas, a Roman goddess of freedom, with its designer, Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi, blending his brother’s facial features into the feminine form, evoking subtle he-she imagery and associations with prostitution, reminiscent of the "Mother of Harlots."

4. Influence on Occultism and Social Engineering

The myths of Cybele and Attis have inspired much of modern occultism, contributing to efforts to normalize extreme behaviors—ranging from gender fluidity to acts like infanticide and cannibalism. Far from being a recent phenomenon, these ideas trace back to ancient traditions. They reflect a persistent thread of "social engineering" aimed at upending conventional norms, often cloaked in mystical or spiritual justifications.

5. Distortions of Sacred Geometry

These same concepts have warped the principles of Sacred Geometry, which, in their occult reinterpretations, diverge from the natural world and its divine harmony. Originally a framework for understanding cosmic order, Sacred Geometry has been twisted by occult traditions into abstract, unnatural forms that lack grounding in reality.

6. Masonic Connections and the Statue of Liberty

The Statue of Liberty exemplifies these distortions through its Masonic origins. Conceived by Freemason Édouard Laboulaye and sculpted by Bartholdi, the statue was intended as a symbol of Masonic enlightenment. While Freemasonry did not invent these ideas, it adopted and amplified them, particularly in its reworking of Sacred Geometry and gender symbolism. The blending of Libertas’s feminine form with masculine features reflects this esoteric influence, tying the statue to broader occult narratives.

From the Galli cult to modern occultism and Masonic symbolism, the thread of dual-gender deities and gender transgression runs deep. These ideas, while rooted in ancient traditions, continue to shape contemporary ideologies and distortions of natural order. The following discussion will delve deeper into their evolution and impact.

CORRUPTION OF SACRED GEOMETRY

The first stage of the True Sacred Geometry with God self-manifesting and creating his purely masculine geometric, Octahedron shaped body. This is where most will start with and when they become aware that the next set of stages would result in three coequal and simultaneously generated female shapes as the Spherical Bodies of Three Goddesses, they stop and skip over this and start over with more or less stating "God" or "Nature" as if synonymous, abandons the male shape and proceeds to focus indefinitely on the feminine form which is used to more or less create a sense God becomes female suddenly to the less aware of how this is false. So, it proceeds as follows:

The second state, instead of including all three axes and instead only focusing on one, creates a completely different approach starting over withe the creation of the first central point and then starts drawing things out in a host of other processes as demonstrated here. Be aware this is in fact a violation of the rules and backtracking which is also unnecessary and misleads the observer.

To try and "prove" a universal connection between this process of clustering, which when properly considered does not remotely demonstrate a point in which it collapses inward or forms a true torus shape, and the necessary conversion of the non-physical with the physical, such will call these stages the "6 days of creation" and the "one day of rest" to try and link it to the Genesis story, and then often apply other traced out symbols over the top which is little more than a game of connect the dots rather than connect concept with reality or spirituality with nature other than superficially. For example:

Others try and skip the first process all together and start with a dot, expands it out as a circle so as to completely remove any visual expression of the male, and then proceed to create a similar "Divine Feminine" only structure choosing to ignore nature and the resulting rules of true Sacred Geometry so as to push their anti-male misandry, and promotion of female homosexuality as a tool of manipulation and in many cases, grooming of minors. For example:

This is then claimed to be "evidence" that the "True Supreme Being" is female only, the basis of the so called Divine Feminine primarily being pushed along with other pseudo-histories, and used as a demonstration that it is properly natural that the female can create without a male mate by "giving birth" to all things, and without a male quality at all (which counters the demand for female androgyny that is often perpetuated with these concepts). This is often claimed to be Parthenogenesis, which means "Virgin Birth/Virgin Creation."

However, in reality, such a process in actual nature is the rare, but known case of two eggs within the same female only to merge and produces only a female offspring. So, this being used as a claim because of ancient ignorance to allow for both male or female or dual gendered offspring is nonsense. Some also try and tie this to the concept of a Supreme trinity female deity which is something that was more or less an imposed all female counterpart concept to the Catholic based Trinitarian concept previously shown and was started in the 1960s. Obviously, this doesn't fit in either as a concept much less within the framework demonstrated.

In any case, the Male is again necessary as a foundation point because even the point or dot representing mind as the active masculine would still apply as a first principle. Additionally, this process would apply to the male as much as the three females simultaneously, by being demonstrated as follows and without all this backtracking and skipping around that has been shown here and what most tend to encounter. The following clarifies this once more for the sake of simplicity and presentation of the reality of the harmony being ignored:

If we were to be just as deceitful, we wouldn't need to include the female shapes at all other than as the outer circle simply used as a containment of the design which as also has been explained before, could just as easily be a square and as a container has no actual meaning because you cannot represent true infinity or eternity as a concept or as a reality. The following shows for sake of argument using only the male shape:

We can see it takes less duplication of the previous to create a denser image in which the lines become less visible until they cannot be observed at all. The last one before completely covering any empty spaces has the hexagram placed in the center for clarification. However, it cannot be ignored either that we can also create ever contracting or ever-expanding representations or the circles and lines from the center inward or outward, yet if one is truly contemplating this, even using the hexagram or its closed form as an octahedron, or other angle as a cube, the end points eventually fade into all the various angular rotations to eventually form a circle. However, a circle does not eventually form the end point. What does occur if we use the following method trying to impose a purely feminine approach despite having to use straight lines of orientation which is then often used to impose the deception through visual trickery of the concept of androgyny is that these clusters always lead into the shapes of triangles, cubes, hexagons, and octahedrons, and in some cases pentagon.

What we end up with here is a foundation concept of a shape known as a hypercube, also known as a Tesseract. This is of course by the same actual rules of Sacred Geometry a male shape when we remove the clustered 19 spheres in this example which is in turn are also often applied in a bit of psychological trickery to connect with the 19-year Metonic cycle (simply because of the application of the number 19 and nothing else, though this is claimed to be related to the 12 months of a year and 7 days of the week. However, this falls apart when it is pointed out that the Metonic cycle is based on a 13-month lunar calendar rather than 12-month solar calendar). In any case, this Hypercube is applied to the concept of 4 dimensional concepts of 3D space combined with 1D Space-time continuums.

Some also ignore the rules entirely and will either use two circles as one representing male and the other female, and then use the shape in the center called an almost shape as representing a Single Eye and call it the "Eye of Deity" or "Eye of Providence" and "Eye of God" to name a few, or present the concept of the upright triangle being male and the inverted female, and then combine them as a hexagram to represent the same concept of a He-she deity. In other cases, some will use a single triangle and use one point upright or inverted to represent the concept of Deity or Divinity as a "nature of being or use an infinity loop and call it Godhood/Godhead" and use the other ends for male or female. Others use the symbols shown here with Mercury as a He-she.

Using the Mars symbol for the Male and the Venus symbol for the female and the Mercury symbol for the as a Hermaphrodite in these positions is in part a two-fold method of manipulation. It represents the concept of the imposed idea this nebulous concept of Deity in its formless state can be considered Androgynous/Asexual, that then divides itself simultaneously into the distinct male and female to then recombine as a Hermaphrodite to then perform the "works" of creation. In other senses, this Third is also more of the concept of a Demiurge as the philosophic term goes that is a force of chaos and "denies it's true nature" to create a world of ignorance and then splits souls into male and female so they also remain in a divided state of ignorance which is a concept taken right out of Gnosticism. It's all rather contradictory even from those presented ideas but is a basis for the whole "all physical existence is bad, so the destruction of the physical is a holy and good deed of liberation" and return back to the purity of Oneness and oblivious of self. It's basically a cult of death, suicide and annihilation. Of course this is then pointed out as coming from Zoroastrianism.

Contrary to what is claimed, Zoroastrianism is not actually monotheistic. It only focuses devotion on one deity, however, and is called henotheistic or henotheism. Rather than go through all of it, the basic concepts were that a single source, again being neuter and neutral develops in itself both masculine and feminine polarities and creates the world more or less. Within it develops twin offspring and of them the Evil twin forces its birth to be First Born. The Good One waits to be Born when its proper to do so. The Evil One as a result corrupts creation and limits its time of immortality leading to its own eventual end of existence, and eventually the "Good One" will take over that will not have that limitation and redeem the world by cleansing it of the corruption. Both are presented also He-She beings also but also manifest in sets of three male versions and three female versions of themselves that then produce all good and evil beings by these other embodiments procreating. A literal fucking themselves thing.

1. The He-She Deity and Its Philosophical Roots

Zurvanism and Heresy: Certain traditions posit a "he-she" parent deity, a concept some label as heretical, notably within Zurvanism, where mentioning it stirs controversy.
Deism’s Influence: This entity is distant and apathetic, resembling the Deist view of a creator who sets the universe in motion and then steps away, exerting no further influence over its creations.
Gnostic and Pythagorean Distortions: Gnosticism and Pythagorean ideas borrow from this framework, weaving in their own peculiar twists.
The Divine Feminine Obsession: From these roots springs the modern fixation on the "Divine Feminine," a trope that often sidelines the masculine entirely or casts it as inherently wicked, paving the way for the excesses of radical feminist ideology.

As a note, if we count the total number of male and female forms from Zoroastrianism and include Zurvanism which isn't as heretical as is often claimed, there would be 7 males and 7 females or 14 engendered aspects in all, 2 if removing Zurvan, and 3 A-sexual entities, or 2 if removing Zurvan. If we go with the 14 + 3 the number works out to 17 primary forms or expressions of 3 primary entities of good, neutral and evil. The likelihood the Zurvan factor was removed is it didn't fit the intended "pure duality" system to fit with the concepts of day and night, good and evil, light and dark and therefore a concept of 6 months of light and 6 months of dark, and ignoring the indifferent, neutral twilight aspect of things.

In other words, it didn't exactly fit their intended system to make a connection with natural cycles and indeed this dualism was absorbed into many later, and more "redefined" monotheistic constructs; especially when it comes to Gnosticism and the idea the world and its creator is bad and corrupt and not the same as the highest source as all good and pure, and all that rhetoric. One finds, as well, a lot of bullshit gnostic ideas as part of the "messaging" of so called "alien entities from other worlds or dimensions or wherever such invent these fictional creatures' origins; things whose forms and expressions are rooted in the insanity of this occultism and its corruptions.

2. The Agenda of Liberation and Rejection of Biology

Destructive Preoccupation: This preoccupation spirals into a broader agenda: the dismantling of society, civilization, and even the natural world, all framed as steps toward "true liberation."
Binary Nature Denied: Such liberation demands the rejection of humanity’s binary essence—male and female—dismissing rare intersex conditions as mere anomalies, not ideals.
Misuse of Intersex Conditions: These conditions, often life-threatening without medical aid, are misconstrued to support notions of "gender dysphoria" and the fallacy that gender is a social construct rather than a biological fact, recorded at birth, not assigned by whim.
Mental Instability: This distortion reflects a deeper mental instability, rooted more in esoteric fantasy than reality.

3. Historical Consequences and Roman Perspectives

Civilizational Decline: History reveals a grim pattern: when civilizations embrace these warped beliefs, they unravel from within to cause families to fracture, social cohesion to erode, and rates of disease and psychological disorders soar, leading to collapse of civilizations; not from external foes, but from self-inflicted decay.
Survival Through Force: Even the Romans, often romanticized by occult enthusiasts, saw hermaphroditic births as ill omens, signs of a corrupted natural order cursed by their capricious, malevolent gods.
Occult View of Hermaphroditism: Only a few societies escape this downward spiral, typically through forceful, sometimes brutal, measures to restore sanity. Through these "occult" concepts the reconciliation and eventual elimination of gender and duality has been pushed as achieving "transcendent divinity" of nature when it's actually a corruption of it.

4. Medical Science vs. Occult Ambitions

Victorian Biological Inquiry: In the Victorian era, medical pioneers sought to define hermaphroditism with precision, distinguishing "true hermaphrodites" (possessing both ovarian and testicular tissue) from "pseudo-hermaphrodites" (with one tissue type but ambiguous anatomy).
Perverse Scientific Goals: Yet, some twisted this science, pursuing unnatural goals—chemically or surgically transforming entire populations into hermaphrodites or androgynes, believing it would elevate humans to divine status.
Psychology’s Role: Meanwhile, contemporary psychology and academic journals peddle the idea that gender resides solely in the mind, a notion steeped in occultism rather than empirical evidence.
Betrayal of Nature: This agenda betrays biology, chasing a chimeric vision of deity at the expense of nature itself.

The Occult Underpinnings of the Trans Movement’s Extremes

The transgender movement, in its most radical expressions, reflects a revival of occult ideologies that reject humanity’s binary nature, rooted in ancient mysticism rather than modern reason. This echoes Zurvanism’s "he-she" deity and the Roman Galli cult’s gender-bending rituals, where castration was a sacred act to mirror divine ambiguity. Filtered through Gnostic and Deist ideas of a detached creator, these concepts resurface today, prioritizing the "Divine Feminine" and vilifying the masculine—hallmarks of the trans movement’s ideological fringe.

Public examples abound. The 2015 TED Talk by transgender activist Ash Beckham, while not overtly occult, framed gender identity as a transcendent personal truth, echoing Gnostic self-deification over biological reality.
More explicitly, the 2021 "Satanic Temple" campaign in Texas leveraged transgender rights to challenge abortion laws, intertwining gender fluidity with occult symbolism—a public nod to esoteric rebellion against natural order. The Temple’s rituals, documented in press releases, often celebrate androgyny as liberation, mirroring the Galli’s ethos.
History underscores the peril. Civilizations that embraced such distortions—like Rome, which viewed hermaphroditic births as omens of collapse—saw internal decay, a pattern evident today as family structures weaken and mental health crises spike.
The trans movement’s misuse of intersex conditions to deny binary sex, seen in advocacy materials from groups like GLAAD (e.g., their 2020 "Transgender FAQ"), parallels occult fantasies of androgyny as divine.
Meanwhile, figures like Martine Rothblatt, a trans tech mogul, have openly blended gender ideology with transhumanism in works like The Apartheid of Sex (1995), envisioning a post-biological utopia—a vision steeped in occult aspirations for godlike transcendence.

Bio-Medical Sciences has bent to this agenda.

Victorian classifications of hermaphroditism have been warped by modern experiments, such as the 2018 Cambridge study on hormone blockers for trans youth, which critics argue pushes androgyny unnaturally.
Psychology’s role is stark in the American Psychological Association’s 2015 guidelines, normalizing gender as a mental state over biology—a stance reminiscent of the Galli’s self-alteration as spiritual ascent.
From Satanic activism to academic endorsements, the trans movement’s extremes reveal an occult thread, driving a rejection of nature that history warns ends in ruin.

Notes on Examples:

Ash Beckham’s TED Talk (2015): Publicly available on TED’s platform, it emphasizes gender as a personal narrative, aligning with mystical self-definition.
Satanic Temple (2021): Covered by outlets like The Hill and Newsweek, their transgender-inclusive rituals link occultism to gender ideology explicitly.
GLAAD’s FAQ (2020): Accessible online, it reframes intersex conditions to support fluid gender narratives, reflecting ideological distortion.
Martine Rothblatt’s The Apartheid of Sex (1995): A published work advocating for a genderless future, blending trans identity with esoteric transhumanism.
Cambridge Study (2018): Reported in The Guardian, it explores puberty blockers, criticized as unnatural by some, hinting at occult-inspired manipulation.
APA Guidelines (2015): Publicly available, they prioritize subjective gender identity, paralleling mystical over empirical frameworks.

This is all part of what is known today most clearly as imposed social engineering!

Imposed social engineering refers to deliberate efforts by authorities, institutions, or influential groups to reshape society’s behaviors, beliefs, or structures according to a specific agenda, often overriding natural cultural evolution or individual choice.
It involves top-down strategies—like policies, propaganda, or cultural campaigns—to enforce changes, such as altering gender norms or promoting ideological conformity, typically bypassing organic consensus or traditional values.
This approach is frequently cloaked not only in occultism, with its esoteric symbols and rejection of natural order, but also in Marxism, which provides a framework of class struggle, collectivism, and the dismantling of established hierarchies—recasting social upheaval as a revolutionary necessity to achieve utopian equality.
Together, these ideologies mask coercive control as liberation, blending mystical transcendence with materialist dogma to justify radical societal overhaul.

OTHERS TRY TO CONFUSE OR ERASE GENDER CONCEPTS. WE DON'T.

THE BASICS: This simple example shows that each Goddess has a heterosexual union with God and a homosexual union with one another rendering them bisexual in nature and orientation. The One God remains purely heterosexual in his relations with the three Goddesses as their mutual and collective unity is exclusive rather than inclusive of any others but transcends the orientations.

It should also be noted that this concept is also based in the concept that since the three Goddesses where derived from the one God, that they naturally inherited some of his gender qualities which also contributes to their bisexuality.

On the other side of this is the basic concept that sexual relations serve, when applied properly, as necessary mechanism for creating deeper emotional bonds more effectively than such bonds being forged purely through mutual awareness and becomes a form of sexual psychology.

The 6 and 3 expressions

The fundamental binary nature are the male and female genders serves as the cornerstone of reproductive structures in many species. Male is the gender that sire's offspring, and female is the gender that conceives and births offspring, embody the essence of reproduction as a dualistic process. Together, these distinct genders establish critical biological and relational bonds. Feelings do not change these facts.

We must also realize that properly speaking, humans in proper form are dimorphic (male or female), and other combinations, or lack of, of these two genders are defects, while this is not applicable to other species. In turn, trying to apply qualities of unrelated species to human beings is equally illogical, irrational, irrelevant, unreasonable and delusional though there are transsexual, hermaphroditic, androgynous and neuter things.

Sexual Orientations and Connections

Sexual differences and orientations are not confined solely to the purpose of procreative capability. They also serve as a means of creating mental, emotional, and spiritual connections, encouraging mutual understanding and reliance, and highlighting shared significance between individuals. These aspects transcend biological function and contribute to the essential dynamics of human relationships.

Barriers to Addressing Sexuality

It is natural for many people to experience shock or discomfort when faced with such perspectives, largely due to societal conditioning that promotes ignoring, dismissing, or avoiding logical, cultural, or even linguistic discussions of these matters. This ingrained avoidance often stems from an unwillingness or inability to confront the complexities of human sexuality openly.

Modern Terminology and Historical Context

One method by which these topics are evaded is through the argument that terms such as "homosexual," "heterosexual," and "bisexual" are relatively modern constructs—particularly the term "bisexual" when discussing orientation. While this claim is factually accurate in part, it is not entirely true. Historically, alternative expressions and terms have existed, providing clarity about these relationships through nuanced phrasing. Such language often carried implicit meanings, sometimes referred to as "loaded language," which indirectly conveyed the essence of these orientations and connections.

Heterosexual Orientation

This refers to individuals who are romantically or sexually attracted to members of the opposite gender. For example, males attracted to females or females attracted to males.

Homosexual Orientation

This pertains to individuals who are romantically or sexually attracted to members of the same gender. For instance, males attracted to males or females attracted to females.

Bisexual Orientation

This describes individuals who experience romantic or sexual attraction toward members of both genders, male and female.

These categories provide a foundation for understanding human sexual orientation, with the possibility of additional subcategories and nuances emerging from these primary types.

Biological Frameworks

The primary biological facts remain; there are two distinct genders—male, which sires offspring, and female, which conceives and births offspring. Variations of these genders include androgynous individuals (asexual reproduction without a mate) and hermaphroditic individuals (reproduction through self-fertilization or breeding with another hermaphrodite). These mixed forms of gender are specific and normal in certain species but are considered defects in humans, arising from diverse factors affecting reproduction.

Neuter or Sexless Forms: This category includes beings without gender distinctions. Such organisms reproduce through self-division, resulting in clones of the original parent. Though this process is viable in specific species, it does not pertain to human biology, where reproduction relies on male and female roles.
Distinctive Male and Female: These two primary forms are the foundation of gender classification, with clearly defined reproductive functions—siring and birthing offspring.
Hermaphroditic Individuals: Hermaphrodites possess both male and female reproductive characteristics within a single being. These individuals procreate through self-fertilization or breeding with other hermaphroditic counterparts. This form is a natural and functional adaptation in specific species but is considered a reproductive defect in humans caused by various factors.
Androgynous Individuals: Androgynous forms combine male and female traits but reproduce asexually without a mate. This spontaneous reproductive method is a survival mechanism in certain species but does not apply to humans in a normative biological sense. In humans, androgyny is regarded as a deviation or impairment rather than a functional reproductive strategy.
Transsexual Forms: This final category includes beings that are generally considered Hermaphroditic, as they change their genders between the male or the female if one of the two genders are absent in a population such as in the cases of fish.

These five categories — two primary and three variations—illustrate the diversity of reproductive expressions across species. Furthermore, they provide a framework from which many other subcategories of reproduction can be observed and understood.

Neuter/Sexless Forms

Finally, there is the neuter or sexless category, characterized by species incapable of procreation or self-fertilization. Such species may reproduce through division, creating clones of the original parent. However, this form of reproduction is irrelevant to human biology, as humans do not possess such traits.

How this relates to our concept of the One and Three is simply they are the sources of everything and therefore everything else is under their control and dominion. As such, everything has its proper place for the particular species in the whole of nature and the natural structure of things suited to their species and their contributions of life itself that has no specific qualities of good or evil as much as factors of what is defined as necessity based: necessary or unnecessary. It is important for these factors to be clarified so as to address and remove much of the deceit around these subjects since this is often applied to such subjects as the way the Divine relates to the Mundane or Infernal.

These are also distinct from marital arrangements:

The following is going to be direct with the proper and simplified explanation of forms of relationships contrary to the confused nonsense often perpetuated through various sources to try and minimize or misapply such terms and definitions on purpose for various less than honorable and selfish agendas. (Be aware, whatever type of relationship consenting adults/persons over 18 years of age choose to be involved in, it is between them and neither we, nor government should hold any dictatorship over them other than when it comes to the actual abuse or deception of involved parties, wherein the ones responsible for such deceit should be subject to some sort of reasonable punishment.

Monogamy: A union between two individuals only.
Polygamy: A general term for multiple-partner marriages which include:

Polyamory: A modern term rooted in concepts like partner swapping or group relationships (orgies).
Polygyny: One male with two or more females.
Polyandry: One female with two or more males.
Bigamy: Marriage of one person to two individuals simultaneously, without mutual awareness (A man with two wives and/or families unaware of one another, or a woman with two husbands and/or families unaware of one another. Essentially living two separate lives.
Concubinage: Generally speaking, it is form of slavery, most commonly any extra secondary wives to a primary "higher rank wife" who's primary duties are to be attendants of the "main wife" but may be used to bear heirs for her master and other "domestic" tasks.

The structure of the relations of the One and Three fall within the Polygyny definition. Generally speaking, the only structure of relationships considered acceptable and with limits are general Monogamy, Polygyny and Polyandry. Polyamory is considered pointless and undermines the concepts of marriages, Bigamy is rejected because of its deceitfulness, and Concubinage, regardless the variations of it, for what it is; sexual slavery. In any case, Druwayu itself is not to be used as either a justification or excuse for or against any form of marriage, and we recognize that historically and biologically the most common form of marriage, suited to our species predominately is Polygyny, which is also based squarely on the sciences of biology, genetics, reproduction and history.

Sexual preferences are not sexual orientations or genders:

Sexual preference refers to the type of sexual attraction or inclinations regarding the types of sexual activities they enjoy or find appealing. It’s more about personal likes or dislikes, sometimes referred to as "kinks." For example:

Sensory Preferences
- These focus on specific sensations that heighten arousal or enjoyment.
  - Touch: Light feather tickling, firm gripping, or massage-like caresses. A kink like "sensation play" often ties into this, where tools like silk scarves or leather paddles enhance tactile experiences.
  - Temperature Play: Using warm wax dripped on the skin (e.g., wax play) or ice cubes trailed across the body to create contrast and stimulation.
  - Textures: Preferences for materials like latex, fur, or velvet against the skin, often linked to kinks like "latex fetishism" or sensory-focused bondage with textured ropes.
Role Preferences
- These involve the interpersonal dynamics or power structures that individuals find appealing.
  - Dominance: Taking control, such as in BDSM dynamics where one partner directs the scene (e.g., a "Dom" issuing commands or using restraints).
  - Submission: Yielding control, like in a submissive role where one enjoys following orders or being tied up (e.g., "collar play" or service-oriented submission).
  - Equal Roles: Preferring a balanced exchange with no power hierarchy, such as mutual teasing or cooperative roleplay (e.g., a kink like "switching" where roles alternate fluidly).
Setting Preferences
- These relate to the environment or context in which activities occur.
  - Romantic Settings: A candlelit bedroom with soft music, often tied to kinks like "erotic romance" or sensual ambiance play.
  - Adventurous Settings: Public places or outdoors, linked to exhibitionism or "thrill-seeking" kinks where the risk of being caught heightens excitement.
  - Familiar Settings: A home environment with a cozy, intimate vibe, possibly connected to "domestic kink" where everyday spaces become eroticized.
Frequency Preferences
- This reflects how often someone desires engagement.
  - Frequent: Daily or regular encounters, potentially aligning with kinks like "hypersexuality" or ritualistic play where consistency is arousing.
  - Occasional: Saving activities for special moments, such as "anticipation kink" where buildup and rarity increase intensity (e.g., edging or delayed gratification).
Style Preferences
- These describe the tone or approach to interactions.
  - Tender: Gentle, loving exchanges like slow kissing or caressing, often linked to "sensualist" kinks focused on emotional connection.
  - Playful: Teasing, tickling, or light-hearted roleplay (e.g., "puppy play" or "brat taming" where fun defiance is central).
  - Spontaneous: Unplanned, impulsive moments, such as a quick encounter in an unexpected place, tied to kinks like "free use" or chaotic energy play.
  - Structured: Planned scenes with rules, like in formal BDSM contracts or "protocol kink" where adhering to a script is the turn-on.

In and of themselves they are not "bad" till they start becoming abusive, especially when they start involving like "sexual assault" or "sexual battery," and or involving children which is completely unacceptable. It can include physical acts, such as assault or molestation, as well as non-physical acts like harassment, exploitation, or coercion.

This also includes those who get sexual pleasure from sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual acts, including penetration or contact, achieved through force, threats, or when the victim is incapable of consenting (mentally and physically impaired, corpses, etc.) and non-consensual exploitation such as sharing "private photos."

False allegations of any form of sexual abuse are seldom mentioned as falling within the confines of "sexual preferences," however, there are some that do in fact get a sense of sexual pleasure from making such false reports along which such things as physical assault and even murder. Just because it isn't reported, doesn't make it false.

Common Religious Teaching to Avoid:

Believers go to the Good Place.
Non-believers go to the Bad Place.
Believers must convert non-believers to save them.
Failure to convert them sends them to the Bad Place.
Failure causes the believer to share in such suffering.
To save oneself one must destroy the non-believer.
Flaws in these Teaching:
- It's a common but flawed concept that harms spiritual identity and destroys lives.
- It imposes a belief all are born bad and doomed to suffer anyways.
- It presents a false sense of hope and a delusion of impossible perfectionism.

Common Religious Teaching to Embrace:

Authentic Spiritual Teachings:

Understand natural and cultural laws.
Treat others properly and see them for who they are.
Be honest with yourself and others.
Work hard without harming others.
Collaborate with those who share your goals.

How to Be a Better Person:

Be fair, honest, and caring regardless of others' actions.
Value self-care and care for others, yet not against their will.
Respect others' beliefs without forcing agreement.
Admit mistakes and accept correction.

Living in the Present:

True motivation should not be based on fear of punishment or reward.
Focus on living a full life now, not obsessing over the afterlife.
Physical and spiritual aspects of life are interconnected.
Appreciate and respect the physical world and life experiences.

Conclusion:

Embrace physical and spiritual aspects of life as a whole.
Don't be something you are not or what others demand or expect you to be.
Authentic spirituality involves living well in the present, not fixating on an afterlife.
Reject harmful beliefs that disconnect us from the physical world and our well-being.
Believe in nothing just because someone demands you have to or threatens you if you don't.
Never make different and distinct things the same and the same things different and distinct.
Always question everything, explore all information on everything, and above all else determine who you are for you because you live with yourself all the time and cannot run from yourself no matter how hard you try to do so.

OUR DEITIES

SELECT VIDEOS