Druwayu stands in direct opposition to the destructive ideologies of Marxism, Socialism, and Communism, rejecting their reliance on authoritarianism, division, and the suppression of individual freedoms. Where Marxist philosophies demand centralized control, class conflict, and societal homogenization, Druwayu champions logic, rationality, and the dignity of individual choice.
Rather than seeking to abolish structures through violence, coercion, or the erosion of cultural identity, Druwayu embraces the diversity of thought and human creativity. It is a philosophy rooted in truth, personal integrity, and the empowerment of its adherents through the pursuit of knowledge and wisdom. Druwayu fosters unity and respect, standing as a beacon of hope and authenticity against the oppressive doctrines that have historically dismantled civilizations. In every sense, Druwayu is a celebration of humanity’s potential and a rejection of ideologies that sow destruction and chaos.
Who and what Karl Marx was
Karl Marx was truly a cruel and evil willed man. That is not an overstatement. When Karl Marx died in March 1883, only about a dozen people attended his funeral at a cemetery in London, England, including family members. Karl Marx was a German-born Jewish philosopher, political theorist, and laughably defined as an "economist, journalist and revolutionary socialist." He is best-known for the 1848 pamphlet The Communist Manifesto, and his three-volume Das Kapital, a critique of classical political economy which employs his theory of historical materialism in an analysis of capitalism, in the culmination of his life's work.
Marx's ideas and their subsequent development, collectively known as Marxism, have had enormous destructive influence. He himself is often quoted as saying that "his greatest gift to the world will be his death." Perhaps that is the only honorable and truthful thing that can be said of this monstrosity. However, before we get into that part, pay attention. Note he is both a socialist and a communist. By comparison Ebenezer Scrooge, a fictional character, was much kinder as a cold-hearted miser who despises Christmas, Charity and the poor was warmer and at least redeemable.
Socialism
Economic Inefficiency: Centralized control of resources leads to mismanagement, lack of innovation, and inefficiency.
Aligns with Marxism's push for centralized economic control, which often undermines productivity.
Lack of Incentives: Redistribution and limits on private ownership reduce motivation to innovate or excel.
Consistent with Marxist disdain for private ownership and profit-driven incentives.
Always Leads to Authoritarianism: Socialist regimes devolve into authoritarianism as the state assumes total control.
Marxism envisions the "state as a transition phase," but in practice, this has led to authoritarian rule.
Erosion of Individual Freedom: Restrictions on personal freedoms through censorship and collectivism.
Marxism prioritizes collective ownership over individual liberties, aligning closely with this point.
Unsustainable Redistribution: Wealth redistribution creates dependency, leading to economic stagnation.
Marxist principles aim for equality but fail to address the long-term viability of such policies.
Historical Failures: Examples include the Soviet Union, Venezuela, and Nazi Germany, all of which mismanaged economies and implemented oppressive policies.
Marxist ideologies underpinned the Soviet Union and heavily influenced Venezuela's socialist policies.
Communism
Forced Relocations: Displacement of populations to suppress dissent and redistribute resources.
A direct application of Marxist ideals of reshaping society, seen in Stalin’s relocations and similar practices.
Erosion of Cultural Identity: Homogenizing societies through displacement and undermining local traditions.
Rooted in Marxist goals of erasing class, cultural, and societal distinctions.
Economic Disruption: Mass displacements disrupt economies, agriculture, and infrastructure.
Marxist economic plans often ignore the unintended consequences of forced population changes.
Control Through Fear: Using displacement as a method to suppress resistance and maintain control.
An authoritarian application of Marxist principles of maintaining "order" during societal transitions.
Historical Examples: Mao’s China, Pol Pot’s Cambodia, and Stalin’s Soviet Union relied on displacement as part of communist agendas.
All were directly inspired by Marxist principles reshaping society to fit an ideological vision.
Marxism
Economic Unrealism: Assumes a classless, stateless society can emerge, ignoring incentives and complexities of economic systems.
Central to Marxist theory, which fails to account for the natural dynamics of competition and innovation.
Authoritarian Tendencies: Centralization of power has historically led to oppression and a lack of freedoms.
Marxism’s transitional state has repeatedly devolved into authoritarianism.
Displacement and Social Engineering: Forced relocations and social engineering are used to enforce Marxist ideologies.
This aligns with the belief in reshaping society to fit theoretical ideals.
Historical Failures: Countries like the Soviet Union and Maoist China experienced collapse and systemic violence under Marxist frameworks.
These regimes demonstrated the catastrophic outcomes of applying Marxist principles.
Suppression of Individual Freedom: Prioritizes collective ownership, often at the expense of personal freedoms and creativity.
Marxism inherently opposes individualism in favor of collectivism.
Intentionally Created Class Conflict: Frames history as a perpetual struggle between oppressors and the oppressed, fostering division.
Marxist doctrine relies on this narrative to justify radical societal changes, often leading to chaos.
Shared Features Across the Three
Economic Mismanagement: All rely on centralized economic control, leading to inefficiency and stagnation.
Authoritarianism: State control in both Socialism and Communism stems from Marxist principles, resulting in oppression.
Suppression of Freedom: Individual liberties are eroded in favor of collectivist ideologies in all three systems.
Historical Catastrophes: Examples of failure highlight the flaws in Marxist foundations that underpin Socialism and Communism.
This categorization highlights how Marxism serves as the theoretical root, with Socialism and Communism applying its principles in ways that have historically led to widespread suffering and systemic failure. But many morons continue to try and polish this turn to their own demise. Now, let's look closer at this long dead monstrosity that far too many continue to idolize as some sort of holy man.
Indeed, as some have said, no other faith or belief-system has had such a worldwide impact as Marxism, since the birth of Christianity and the rise of Islam. Not sure that would be much of a compliment, but if you have only these three choices, go with Christianity or stick with Druwayu.
Marxian vision of a “new society” and a “new man,” socialist and communist revolutions led to the mass murders, enslavement, torture, and starvation of tens of millions of people around the world. Historians have estimated that in the attempt to make that “new” and “better” socialist world, communist regimes have killed as many as, maybe, 200 million people in the twentieth century.
Early Life and Education
Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818, in Trier, Rhineland. His parents were Jewish, descending from a long line of respected rabbis on both sides of the family. However, to pursue a legal career in the Kingdom of Prussia, Marx’s father converted to Protestantism. Karl himself rejected all religious beliefs at an early age, becoming a professed atheist—a stance that arguably casts atheism in a negative light.
Marx began his studies in Bonn before transferring to the University of Berlin to pursue a doctoral degree in philosophy. However, his academic career was marked by laziness and lack of effort. Much of the money sent by his father for tuition was squandered on food, drink, and late-night debates about Hegelian philosophy in coffee houses and taverns. He eventually earned his doctorate by submitting his dissertation to the University of Jena, a less prestigious institution, barely meeting the requirements.
Career and Political Activities
Marx’s professional life was limited to sporadic roles as a journalist and editor for various newspapers and journals. Most of these ventures failed due to low readership, financial instability, or political censorship. His political writings and activism forced him to relocate multiple times, from Paris to Brussels, and finally to London in 1849, where he lived until his death, with occasional trips to the European continent.
Personal Life and Relationships
Karl Marx is widely believed to have had one illegitimate child with Helene Demuth, the family maid, who remained with him, his family and his wife. Helene gave birth to a son, Frederick Demuth, on June 23, 1851. The birth certificate left the father's name blank, but it is widely accepted that Marx was the father. To avoid scandal, Marx had his close friend and collaborator, Friedrich Engels, claim paternity of the child. Engels, on his deathbed, revealed the truth in a letter to Marx’s daughter Eleanor, stating, "Freddy is Marx’s son," shattering her perception of her father’s reputation.
Karl Marx is often said to have had seven though it is actually 8 when considering these factors of history which includes one with the household maid as stated. The other children were with his wife, Jenny von Westphalen, and only three survived into adulthood, however, four of these children died in childhood. Of the three that survived into adulthood, one died of an assumed illness and the other two committed suicide. It breaks down as follows:
Children Who Died in Childhood
Charles Louis Henri Edgar Marx ("Mush")
Born: 1847
Died: 1855, at the age of 8.
Cause of Death: Poor health exacerbated by the family's impoverished living conditions.
Henry Edward Guy Marx
Born: 1849
Died: 1850, at just over 1 year old.
Cause of Death: Convulsions.
Jenny Eveline Frances Marx
Born: 1851
Died: 1852, shortly after her first birthday.
Cause of Death: Bronchitis, worsened by poverty and lack of medical care.
Unnamed Infant
Born: 1857
Died: Same day as birth.
Cause of Death: Likely birth complications.
Children Who Survived into Adulthood
Jenny Caroline Marx
Born: 1844
Died: 1883, at the age of 38.
Cause of Death: Likely due to illness, specifics unclear.
Jenny Laura Marx
Born: 1845
Died: 1911, at the age of 66.
Cause of Death: Suicide via cyanide alongside her husband, Paul Lafargue.
Jenny Julia Eleanor Marx
Born: 1855
Died: 1898, at the age of 43.
Cause of Death: Suicide via cyanide after personal betrayal by her partner, Edward Aveling.
Authoritarianism and Hypocrisy
Marx’s temperament was authoritarian and cruel. He publicly ridiculed those who disagreed with him, often resorting to humiliation. Privately, he was a hypocrite, flattering individuals when he needed something from them but slandering them behind their backs. His racial slurs, including those directed at Ferdinand Lassalle, a Jewish associate, reveal his deep-seated prejudices despite his own Jewish heritage.
In his essay On the Jewish Question (1844), Marx espoused antisemitic views, portraying Jews as embodying the capitalist system he despised. This rhetoric eerily parallels the Nazi "race-scientists" of the 1930s, who similarly condemned Jews for their alleged pursuit of wealth and societal influence. Marxist Jews, who renounced their heritage, were even labeled "Spiritually Aryans" in Nazi Germany, further complicating his legacy.
Personal Appearance and Lifestyle
Marx’s personal habits were as unkempt as his ideology. A Prussian spy who visited his London home in 1850 described it as filthy, with broken furniture, thick dust, and a pervasive stench. Marx himself was noted for his poor hygiene, rarely washing or changing his clothes, and often reeking of alcohol and body odor. This stark contrast between his public persona and private reality reflects the traits of a narcissist, projecting an image of intellectual superiority while living in squalor.
Legacy of Contradictions
Marx’s life was riddled with contradictions. He promoted authoritarianism in his own home, plagiarized ideas while claiming originality, and espoused antisemitic views despite his Jewish heritage. His personal and professional failures, combined with his cruel treatment of others, paint a picture of a deeply flawed individual whose ideas have had a destructive impact on history.
Gustav Techow, a Prussian military officer involved in the 1848 Berlin insurrection, provides a telling account of Karl Marx during his time in London. After being sentenced and imprisoned for treason, Techow fled to Switzerland, where his revolutionary group later dispatched him to London. While spending time with Marx, Techow observed a man whose intellectual brilliance was paired with notable flaws.
In correspondence to his revolutionary associates, Techow remarked on Marx's contemptuous demeanor and power-driven personality. He described Marx as a figure of "outstanding intellectual superiority" but lamented his lack of compassion, noting that Marx’s ambition seemed to devour any good within him. Techow's observations painted a portrait of a man more interested in personal domination than collective revolutionary ideals. Marx, according to Techow, disdained both friends and foes, viewing them all as inferior.
Playbook for Revolution and Mass Murder
Karl Marx’s explicit intent to dismantle the institutions of society, coupled with his endorsement of violence toward enemies of the communist revolution, is encapsulated in a directive written with Friedrich Engels for the Central Committee of the Communist League in March 1850. This document essentially served as a blueprint for Vladimir Lenin’s execution of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia decades later.
Marx outlined the organization’s goal as “the overthrow of the privileged classes,” initially working in collaboration with the “bourgeois” political parties, which he described as petty and liberal. He criticized these democratic parties for merely aspiring to establish limited reforms, such as reducing government spending, securing private property rights, and introducing welfare programs for the poor. Marx explicitly rejected such a moderate approach, instead advocating for radical, sweeping changes:
"It is our interest and our task to make the revolution permanent until all the more or less propertied classes have been driven from their ruling positions, until the proletariat has conquered state power and until the association of the proletarians has progressed sufficiently far—not only in one country but in all the leading countries of the world… Our concern cannot simply be to modify private property, but to abolish it; not to hush up class antagonisms but to abolish classes; not to improve the existing society but to found a new one."
Armed Councils and State Control
Marx anticipated that after the fall of monarchies, liberal democratic governments might assume power. However, he insisted that these governments must not be allowed to consolidate control. To counteract this, he proposed that the revolutionary proletariat establish armed councils operating outside the authority of any democratic government—a tactic Lenin later implemented through the creation of Soviets in post-Czarist Russia after 1917.
Marx also made it clear that the redistribution of feudal land should not result in private ownership by peasants. Instead, such land was to be collectivized under state control. Rural populations were to live and work on collective farms, while industries were to be nationalized under a centralized proletarian government to ensure the complete eradication of capitalism and “bourgeois” democracy.
Revolutionary Violence and Sustained Chaos
Marx emphasized the importance of maintaining revolutionary fervor after initial victories, instructing communist leaders to avoid suppressing the “immediate revolutionary excitement.” On the contrary, he advocated for the active direction of revolutionary excesses:
"It must be sustained as long as possible. Far from opposing the so-called excesses—instances of popular vengeance against hated individuals or against public buildings with which hateful memories are associated—the workers’ party must not only tolerate these actions but must even give them direction."
This chilling directive amounted to endorsing terrorism and mass murder under the guise of revolutionary vengeance. Such policies laid the groundwork for Lenin’s tactics during the Bolshevik Revolution, which relied on similar strategies of fear and violence to consolidate power. We see this also manifesting in Islam as well with its Sharia Law and other more modern, rather than ancient, sources of its doctrines.
Legacy of Marx’s Vision
Marx’s proposals for class warfare, violence, and the obliteration of societal structures underscore his role in shaping a revolutionary ideology that prioritized ideological purity over human life. His insistence on “making the revolution permanent” provided a roadmap for the atrocities committed under Lenin and subsequent communist regimes. These policies were not incidental but inherent to Marx’s strategy for achieving his vision of a classless society—a vision that, in practice, led to mass displacement, terror, and the deaths of millions. This playbook reveals the dangerous precedents set by Marx’s rhetoric, as it became the foundation for systematic authoritarianism and violence in the name of communism.
Karl Marx’s writings and personal notes occasionally contained imagery and references that have been described as "satanic" by various commentators. These references, while not indicative of any explicit satanic belief system, reveal a dark and provocative tone. Here are some notable examples:
Poetic Writings:
In his poem The Player (1837), Marx wrote: "The hellish vapors rise and fill the brain, Till I go mad and my heart is utterly changed. See this sword—the prince of darkness sold it to me." This line reflects imagery of despair and a deal with dark forces, which some interpret as symbolic of rebellion against societal and divine norms. However, considering his history, this is more likely a romanticized remake of his awareness of his own increasing insanity.
Promethean Themes:
Marx often embraced the figure of Prometheus as a symbol of defiance against authority. In his doctoral dissertation, he referred to Prometheus, proclaiming: "I hate all the gods." While this aligns with his atheistic worldview, the overt antagonism has led some to characterize it as "satanic" rebellion.
Personal Correspondence:
In a letter to his father, Marx described a “demonic” force within him driving his ambitions: "A curtain had fallen, my holy of holies was rent asunder, and new gods had to be set in their place." This passage has been interpreted as an embrace of destructive and transformative forces, though it more likely is an awareness of his own increasing insanity and instability fused to his narcissism as with the first example.
Satanic as Metaphor:
Critics often view Marx’s use of such imagery as metaphorical rather than literal, representing his rejection of authority, religion, and societal structures. However, the provocative language has fueled accusations of his alignment with darker ideologies. However, it is often a hallmark concept of many self-proclaimed atheists and non-theists that use Satan and Satanism for a wide rather of metaphors and symbolism, while also more often than not veiling a more sinister Satanic theism twisted into Gnosticism.
A Desire to Destroy Religion and Religious Freedom
Marxism has historically been intertwined with atheism, particularly through its critique of religion as a tool of oppression. Karl Marx famously described religion as the "opium of the people," viewing it as a mechanism to pacify the masses and maintain the status quo.
This perspective laid the foundation for Marxist-Leninist atheism, which became a core element of state policies in regimes like the Soviet Union and Maoist China.
These governments actively promoted atheism, suppressing religious practices and institutions in favor of a materialist worldview.
As for connections to Satanic movements, some commentators have drawn parallels between Marx's writings and themes of rebellion or defiance often associated with Satanic imagery. For instance, Marx's poetic works, such as The Player, include references to "hellish vapors" and "the prince of darkness," which some interpret as symbolic of his rejection of divine authority, but some also see it as being more expressly theologically Satanic reflecting his disdain for religion and societal norms and "anger" at God (perhaps).
Modern atheist and Satanic movements occasionally draw inspiration from Marxist critiques of religion, particularly in their shared opposition to traditional religious structures.
These connections are often more claimed to me merely thematic than direct, with each movement pursuing distinct goals and ideologies, while other examples of his works and their orders take on a more direct perspective as forces of "necessary destruction."
The Conclusion:
Karl Marx’s life and ideology, along with the dual manifestations of his vision—Socialism and Communism—paint a grim picture of a philosophy that has wrought immense suffering and destruction. Marx himself was a man riddled with contradictions: a professed champion of the oppressed who lived in squalor, exploited those closest to him, and harbored authoritarian tendencies. His personal flaws mirrored the inherent flaws of his ideology, which prioritizes abstract ideals over human life and dignity.
Marxism, in its pursuit of a classless society, has consistently led to authoritarian regimes, economic collapse, and the erosion of individual freedoms. Socialism, with its inefficiencies, lack of incentives, and unsustainable redistribution, paves the way for centralized control and oppression. Communism, its more extreme counterpart, relies on forced relocations, cultural erasure, and terror to maintain power. Both systems, rooted in Marxist theory, have left a legacy of mass displacement, starvation, and the deaths of millions.
The historical record is clear: Marxism, like its creator, is fundamentally flawed and profoundly destructive. Its promises of equality and progress are illusions, masking a reality of authoritarianism, division, and societal decay. Far from building a better world, Marxism and its derivatives have repeatedly dismantled civilizations, leaving devastation in their wake. It is a cautionary tale of how ideology, when divorced from compassion and practicality, can become a force of profound evil.